The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration.
By Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, Johannes B Reitsma, D. Bruns, Constantine Gatsonis, P. Glasziou, L. Irwig, David Moher, D. Rennie, HC de Vet, J. Lijmer. Clinical Chemistry, 2003
791 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Physiology, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/39deb0726e6baf9931c7c4ac508acecb251cb573
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Physiology
In Statistics and Probability
- David Moher
- Douglas G. Altman
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- J. Tetzlaff
- K. F. Schulz
- Mike Clarke
- S. Taube
- Lisa M. McShane
Citations in the corpus
- The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009, positive): “We modeled this Explanation and Elaboration document after those prepared for other reporting guidelines [17,18,19].”
- REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2005, methodology): “…successful CONSORT initiative for randomised clinical trials (Moher et al, 2001), and the STARD statement for studies of diagnostic test accuracy (Bossuyt et al, 2003a), these guidelines suggest relevant information that should be provided about the study design, preplanned hypotheses, patient…”
- The Validity of the Multi-Informant Approach to Assessing Child and Adolescent Mental Health (2015, neutral): “…consisted of clinicians' diagnostic judgments about patients, the study might suffer from criterion contamination if prior to forming their judgments, clinicians had access to information from the predictors evaluated for incremental validity (see also Bossuyt et al., 2003; Whiting et al., 2011).”
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative (2003, neutral): “A separate background document explains the meaning and rationale of each item and briefly summarises the type and amount of evidence (15).”
- Reporting recommendations for tumor marker prognostic studies. (2005, methodology): “html As noted, a detailed explanatory article is to be published elsewhere, following the model of similar articles relating to the CONSORT and STARD statements.(41,42)”