Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative

By Patrick M. M. Bossuyt, Johannes B Reitsma, D. E. Bruns, Constantine Gatsonis, P. Glasziou, L. Irwig, J. Lijmer, D. Moher, D. Rennie, HC de Vet. British medical journal, 2003

2,891 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6652a89d5d33536c5ef0901c452ce4dacc4181f0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003, unknown): “To improve the quality of reporting of studies of Editor's Note: The STARD statement and checklist are published in the first 2003 issues of several journals, including Annals of Internal Medicine (86 ), BMJ, Clinical Chemistry (87 ), and Radiology.”
CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010, methodology): “Other groups are using the CONSORT template to improve the reporting of other research designs, such as diagnostic tests [311] and observational studies [312].”
Spontaneous brain microbleeds: systematic review, subgroup analyses and standards for study design and reporting. (2007, methodology): “, 2003) and Standards for the Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) (Bossuyt et al., 2003).”
Serum procalcitonin and C-reactive protein levels as markers of bacterial infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. (2004, methodology): “The Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy criteria are from [13, 14].”
Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015, unknown): “…MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK)) (McShane et al, 2005), diagnostic accuracy (STAndards for the Reporting of Diagnostic accuracy studies (STARD)) (Bossuyt et al, 2003), and genetic risk prediction (Genetic RIsk Prediction Studies (GRIPS)) (Janssens et al, 2011b) studies all contain many items…”
Recommendations on the Use of 18F-FDG PET in Oncology (2008, background): “Similarly, data were not reported in a standardized fashion (28); for example, although some authors reported sensitivity or”
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007, unknown): “We stress that STROBE and other recommendations on the reporting of research [13,233,234] should be seen as evolving documents that require continual assessment, refinement, and, if necessary, change [235,236].”