S. Taube

Statistics and Probability · 2005–2012

A researcher in the Science corpus: 9 papers; trusts 16 researchers and is trusted by 5 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

Whom S. Taube trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

  1. Douglas G. Altman
  2. David Moher
  3. K. F. Schulz
  4. Patrick Royston
  5. Willi Sauerbrei
  6. Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
  7. David W. Hosmer Jr.
  8. Jr. Frank E. Harrell
  9. Michael R. Chernick
  10. Lisa M. McShane

Who trusts S. Taube overall

  1. Douglas G. Altman

Papers from S. Taube's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers S. Taube trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

  1. Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
  2. The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (Annals of Internal Medicine)
  3. Dichotomizing continuous predictors in multiple regression: a bad idea (Statistics in Medicine)
  4. The challenge of subgroup analyses--reporting without distorting.
  5. Practical statistics for medical research
  6. Survival Analysis Part I: Basic concepts and first analyses (British Journal of Cancer)
  7. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. (Clinical Chemistry)
  8. Applied Survival Analysis: Regression Modeling of Time-to-Event Data
  9. Bootstrap Methods and their Application
  10. Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (Epidemiology)

Their papers