Constantine Gatsonis
Statistics and Probability · 2001–2020
A researcher in the Science corpus: 14 papers; trusts 4 researchers and is trusted by 17 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 58 citations into it; #3,819 of 12,932 by trust here, #982 by citations
Whom Constantine Gatsonis trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts Constantine Gatsonis overall
- Johannes B Reitsma
- R. Harbord
- Dan Jackson
- A. Rutjes
- M. Simmonds
- David Moher
- J. Deeks
- Lisa M. McShane
- Douglas G. Altman
- Patrick M. M. Bossuyt
Papers from Constantine Gatsonis's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers Constantine Gatsonis trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities
- Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
- Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences
- Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. (Spine)
- Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement
- Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. (New England Journal of Medicine)
- Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images
- Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit
- Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle
Their papers
- The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. (2003) — 791 citations
- The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003) — 1,546 citations
- A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations (2001) — 1,426 citations
- STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015) — 3,489 citations
- STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016) — 2,218 citations
- Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy (2008) — 876 citations
- Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020) — 638 citations
- STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. (2015) — 654 citations
- Overdiagnosis in Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening for Lung Cancer (2014) — 741 citations
- CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes. (2012) — 682 citations
- The National Lung Screening Trial: overview and study design. (2011) — 1,241 citations
- MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. (2007) — 916 citations
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative (2003) — 2,891 citations
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003) — 1,134 citations