L. Irwig
Statistics and Probability · 2001–2016
A researcher in the Science corpus: 12 papers; trusts 1 researcher and is trusted by 22 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.
Subfields
- Statistics and Probability — 36 citations into it; #2,817 of 12,932 by trust here, #731 by citations
- Artificial Intelligence — 7 citations into it
Whom L. Irwig trusts overall
Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.
Who trusts L. Irwig overall
- Daniele Fanelli
- John P. A. Ioannidis
- J. Sterne
- Lifeng Lin
- Linyu Shi
- Terri D. Pigott
- Andy Field
- J. Peters
- Matthias Egger
- David Moher
Papers from L. Irwig's perspective
Ordered by how strongly the researchers L. Irwig trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.
- Trim and Fill: A Simple Funnel‐Plot–Based Method of Testing and Adjusting for Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (Biometrics)
- Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research. (The Lancet)
- Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (British medical journal)
- Sources of Variation and Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (Annals of Internal Medicine)
- Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. (Spine)
- Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement
- Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
- Categorical Data Analysis
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (PLoS ONE)
- Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta‐regression (Statistics in Medicine)
Their papers
- The performance of tests of publication bias and other sample size effects in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy was assessed. (2005) — 2,733 citations
- The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. (2003) — 791 citations
- The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003) — 1,546 citations
- A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis (2001) — 1,216 citations
- STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015) — 3,489 citations
- STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016) — 2,218 citations
- STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. (2015) — 654 citations
- Cochrane Systematic Review of Colorectal Cancer Screening Using the Fecal Occult Blood Test (Hemoccult): An Update (2008) — 1,041 citations
- Accuracy and surgical impact of magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer staging: systematic review and meta-analysis in detection of multifocal and multicentric cancer. (2008) — 806 citations
- Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. (2007) — 679 citations
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative (2003) — 2,891 citations
- Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. (2003) — 1,134 citations