HC de Vet

Statistics and Probability · 2003–2020

A researcher in the Science corpus: 25 papers; trusts 15 researchers and is trusted by 8 researchers here, as inferred from the citation graph.

Subfields

• Statistics and Probability — 64 citations into it; #3,994 of 12,932 by trust here, #567 by citations
• Economics and Econometrics — 54 citations into it; #17,426 of 23,481 by trust here, #4,632 by citations
• Management Science and Operations Research — 30 citations into it; #5,398 of 11,946 by trust here, #1,507 by citations
• Sociology and Political Science — 26 citations into it; #15,123 of 22,756 by trust here, #7,374 by citations
• Pharmacology — 21 citations into it; #516 of 1,112 by trust here, #349 by citations
• General Health Professions — 17 citations into it; #4,111 of 4,781 by trust here, #1,084 by citations
• Epidemiology — 15 citations into it
• Pathology and Forensic Medicine — 10 citations into it

Whom HC de Vet trusts overall

Their strongest outbound trust, strongest first, inferred from their citations.

1. C. Terwee
2. L. Mokkink
3. Jose M. Cortina
4. K. Lohr
5. Julian P. T. Higgins
6. D.walaa badawy
7. Dirk L. Knol
8. D. Cella
9. I. Mcdowell
10. Lex M. Bouter

Who trusts HC de Vet overall

1. L. Mokkink
2. C. Prinsen
3. C. Terwee
4. A. Alexandrova
5. David Liljequist
6. D.walaa badawy
7. Lex M. Bouter
8. Jordi Alonso
9. Daniel M. Haybron
10. B. Elfving

Papers from HC de Vet's perspective

Ordered by how strongly the researchers HC de Vet trusts endorse each paper. Same corpus, a different order for every researcher.

1. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
2. What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications
3. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
4. 診断精度研究のバイアスリスク評価ツールQUADAS－2：a Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 の活用
5. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: Guidelines for instrument evaluation (Quality of Life Research)
6. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. (International Journal of Nursing Studies)
7. Unpublished rating scales: A major source of bias in randomised controlled trials of treatments for schizophrenia (British Journal of Psychiatry)
8. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care)
9. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. (Journal of Clinical Epidemiology)
10. On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha (Psychometrika)

Their papers

• The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. (2003) — 791 citations
• The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003) — 1,546 citations
• STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies (2015) — 3,489 citations
• Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. (2007) — 9,788 citations
• The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010) — 3,767 citations
• STARD 2015 guidelines for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: explanation and elaboration (2016) — 2,218 citations
• The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. (2010) — 3,940 citations
• Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (2005) — 799 citations
• When to use agreement versus reliability measures. (2006) — 1,763 citations
• Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments (2009) — 727 citations
• COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (2018) — 2,569 citations
• COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (2017) — 1,905 citations
• Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist (2011) — 1,810 citations
• Categorizing continuous variables resulted in different predictors in a prognostic model for nonspecific neck pain. (2009) — 35 citations
• COSMIN Risk of Bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: a Delphi study (2020) — 451 citations
• COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study (2018) — 1,746 citations
• The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument (2016) — 756 citations
• STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies. (2015) — 654 citations
• Measurement in Medicine: Index (2011) — 824 citations
• Conceptual Frameworks of Individual Work Performance: A Systematic Review (2011) — 607 citations