Priming against your will: How accessible alternatives affect goal pursuit
By James Y. Shah, Arie W. Kruglanski. 2002
314 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3937774ff8902df94b5df532c7735ab2ee276991
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- Henk Aarts
- Peter M. Gollwitzer
- Wolfgang Stroebe
- G. Oettingen
- Gary P. Latham
- Ayelet Fishbach
- Ruud Custers
- Chris Janiszewski
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- Gary P. Latham
- Edwin A. Locke
- Wolfgang Stroebe
- Peter M. Gollwitzer
- Henk Aarts
- Stefano Puntoni
- N. Tavassoli
- Mayowa T. Babalola
In Sociology and Political Science
- Henk Aarts
- Peter M. Gollwitzer
- G. Oettingen
- Wolfgang Stroebe
- Ruud Custers
- Ayelet Fishbach
- Gary P. Latham
- Melissa Ferguson
Citations in the corpus
- Time-Varying Effects of Chronic Hedonic Goals on Impulsive Behavior (2006, unknown): “This should lead to a renewed attempt to shield their goal of staying in control from the temptation (Shah, Friedman, and Kruglanski 2002), thus causing a devaluation of the temptation and a reduction in felt ambivalence.”
- Priming Effects of Television Food Advertising on Eating Behavior (2009, unknown): “A motivational explanation is also quite viable (Bargh, Gollwitzer, Lee-Chai, Barndollar, & Troetschel, 2001; Shah & Kruglanski, 2002).”
- Why dieters fail : Testing the goal conflict model of eating (2017, background): “Goals are menta lly represented as desirable future states that the individual wants to attain (Aarts & Dijksterhuis, 2000; Kruglanski, 1996; Shah & Kruglanski, 2002; Shah, Friedman & Kruglanski, 2002).”
- A business frame perspective on why perceptions of top management's bottom‐line mentality result in employees’ good and bad behaviors (2019, background): “…past research suggests that money-related cues encourage people to work harder and to stay more focused in their pursuit of desired outcomes (Mogilner, 2010; Vohs et al., 2006; Vohs et al., 2008), which then enhances the attainment of desired outcomes (Shah et al., 2002; Shah & Kruglanski, 2002).”
- Beyond Vicary's fantasies: The impact of subliminal priming and brand choice (2006, methodology): “…of B’s followed immediately, and was presented for 300 ms. Previous research using similar subliminal priming procedures has demonstrated that participants are unable to consciously perceive a 23 ms presentation of a word (e.g., Fishbach, Friedman, & Kruglanski, 2003; Shah & Kruglanski, 2002).”
- Compliance Theory: A Goal Framing Approach (2011, background): “In other words, a goal signal “either pulls attention and resources away from the focal goal (and toward the alternative), or draws attention and resources toward the focal goal” (Shah and Kruglanski 2002, 380).”
- The Relevance and Viability of Subconscious Goals in the Workplace (2010, background): “For example, the means word (e.g., run) in a means–goal relationship (run → fit) might be shown subliminally, and the dependent variable is the participant’s response latency to the word (fit; Shah & Kruglanski, 2002).”
- Attachment working models as unconscious structures: An experimental test (2004, background): “Priming effects have been found in studies in which twoword subliminal prime sentences were presented (Shah & Kruglanski, 2002), suggesting that subliminal sentence presentation might be a promising tool for activating unconscious processes.”