Perceptions of Dishonesty among Two-year College Students: Academic versus Business Situations

By M. Smyth, James R. Davis. 2004

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Information Systems and Management, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37eb4eea0e7426938a35f496f26b63bf9e786134

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Information Systems and Management

1. I. Jawahar
2. T. Stone
3. Jennifer L. Kisamore
4. Yvette P. Lopez
5. Ricky W. Griffin

In Safety Research

1. Chiao Ling Huang
2. An-Sing Chen
3. Shu Ching Yang
4. I. Jawahar
5. T. Stone
6. Jennifer L. Kisamore

Citations in the corpus

• Using the theory of planned behavior and cheating justifications to predict academic misconduct (2009, background): “Cheating, plagiarism and similar forms of academic misconduct have been examined in many studies (see Crown and Spiller, 1998; Kisamore et al., 2007; McCabe et al., 1996, 1999, 2001, 2002; Smyth and Davis, 2004; Whitley, 1998).”
• An Investigation of College Students’ Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty, Reasons for Dishonesty, Achievement Goals, and Willingness to Report Dishonest Behavior (2013, background): “Similarly, research on the impact of a student’s academic major on AD has produced inconsistent findings (Eastman, Eastman, & Iyer, 2008; Iyer & Eastman, 2006; Park, 2003; Smyth & Davis, 2004).”