Embeddedness and local food systems: notes on two types of direct agricultural market☆

By C. Hinrichs. 2000

1,471 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Food Science, Plant Science, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/37db0d8f55c76aa3f9f10c6c1790dc0a762651fc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Food Science

1. A. Tregear
2. Sarah Bowen
3. D. Maye
4. B. Ilbery
5. D. Klooster
6. R. Sonnino
7. T. Marsden
8. M. Penker

In Plant Science

1. A. Tregear
2. R. Sonnino
3. J. Wiskerke
4. Sarah Bowen
5. D. Maye
6. B. Ilbery
7. D. Klooster
8. T. Marsden

In Strategy and Management

1. A. Tregear
2. J. Wiskerke
3. R. Sonnino
4. Sarah Bowen
5. T. Marsden
6. Ivan Dufeu
7. R. L. Velly
8. D. Wright

Citations in the corpus

• Local Food Systems: Concepts, Impacts, and Issues (2012, background): “Social embeddedness in the sense of social connections, mutual exchange, and trust is viewed by some as an important feature of direct agricultural marketing (Hinrichs, 2000; Sage, 2003).”
• Progressing knowledge in alternative and local food networks: Critical reflections and a research agenda (2011, background): “…of north American and European research (Goodman, 2003), explored how relationships between alternative and conventional systems are theorised (Watts et al, 2005; Sonnino and Marsden, 2006) and how meanings of alterity are constructed (e.g. Goodman, 2004; DuPuis and Goodman, 2005; Hinrichs, 2000).”
• Opening Spaces through Relocalization: Locating Potential Resistance in the Weaknesses of the Global Food System (2002, neutral): “…opposite of this embeddness is “the ‘lifting out’ of social relations from local contexts of interaction and their restructuring across indefinite spans of time-space” (Giddens 1990, p. 21), a point that is also explored by Hinrichs (2000) in an examination of different types of direct marketing.”
• Food supply chains and sustainability: evidence from specialist food producers in the Scottish/English borders (2005, background): “Rather, it suggests, as previously noted by Hinrichs (2000) , that businesses (like DEFRA), are likely to act ‘instrumentally’9 to improve competitiveness, economic”
• Locally Grown Foods and Farmers Markets: Consumer Attitudes and Behaviors (2010, background): “the tensions between ―embeddedness‖ and ―marketness and instrumentalism‖ in local food systems [20].”
• Towards a theory of values-based labeling (2002, background): “Several authors who are supportive in many respects of values-based labeling, including labels that attempt to “re-localize” food systems, have been critical of the implementation of actual labeling schemes on several counts (du Toit, 2001; Freidberg, 2001; Hinrichs, 2000, 2001; Renard, 2001; Shre”
• Farm to school programs: exploring the role of regionally-based food distributors in alternative agrifood networks (2010, background): “... is supporting agriculture that is more localized and sustainable than large-scale, chemical intensive, industrial-style agriculture’’ and to educate children—and school food service staff—about their food, who grew it and how it was grown (Azuma and Fisher 2001, p. 2). This deliberate attempt to”
• Local food hubs for alternative food systems: A case study from Santa Barbara County, California (2014, background): “…mainstream and alternative perspectives on hubs and the food system in dichotomous ways has been challenged as an ‘overly simplistic binary contrast’ (Hinrichs, 2000), and Izumi et al. (2010b) insisted that regionally-based food distributors (‘food hubs’) need to be analysed as hybrids between the…”
• Drivers of local food consumption: A comparative study (2015, background): “Indeed, supporting local farmers is one of the main reasons given by consumers for buying local foods in a number of studies (Autio et al., 2013, Hinrichs, 2000, Feagan et al., 2004, Hunt, 2007, Winter, 2003).”