Benefits of Electronic Audience Response Systems on Student Participation, Learning, and Emotion

360 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Using Student Response Systems (“Clickers”) to Combat Conformity and Shyness (2010, background): “In a previous study, when students used keypads to respond to in-class review questions, they were more likely to respond and, more important, were more honest in their responding than students in a handraising comparison group (Stowell & Nelson, 2007).”
Vibrant student voices: exploring effects of the use of clickers in large college courses (2008, background): “A recent paper by Stowell and Nelson ( 2007 ) compared four methods for increasing student engagement with course concepts, measured in terms of participation rates and positive emotion.”
Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Personal Response System in the Classroom (2009, background): “Generally, the use of clickers is associated with or causes increased participation (Stowell & Nelson, 2007).”
Using clickers in class. The role of interactivity, active collaborative learning and engagement in learning performance (2013, background): “The effect of active collaborative learning on student performance is further enhanced when it is combined with the use of technology (Stowell & Nelson, 2007).”