ATTITUDE CONSTRUCTION: EVALUATION IN CONTEXT
By Norbert Schwarz. 2007
653 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/3626a1837d2db05c256cb5f24a8dc4618a950c44
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Social Psychology
- Bertram Gawronski
- J. de Houwer
- D. Barnes-Holmes
- Galen Bodenhausen
- Sean Hughes
- Richard E. Petty
- P. Briñol
- R. Fazio
In Sociology and Political Science
- Bertram Gawronski
- J. de Houwer
- Galen Bodenhausen
- D. Barnes-Holmes
- Sean Hughes
- Richard E. Petty
- P. Briñol
- Norbert Schwarz
Citations in the corpus
- Ambivalence and certainty can interact to predict attitude stability over time (2016, background): “On occasion, they are quite malleable and ephemeral (Converse, 1964; Schwarz, 2007).”
- Identity-based motivation: Implications for action-readiness, procedural-readiness, and consumer behavior (2009, neutral): “More recent key formulations of this theme come from Smith and Semin's situated social cognition model (2004, 2007), Fiske's (1992) thinking-is-for-doing formulation of the situatedness of social cognition, and Schwarz's (2007, in press) situational sensitivity formulation of social judgment.”
- Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision (2012, background): “The quantum approach agrees very well with the constructionist view of belief, attitude, and intention proposed by social psychologists (Schwarz, 2007).”
- A History of Implicit Social Cognition Where Is It Coming From? Where Is It Now? Where Is It Going? (2010, background): “, Broadbent, 1971; Treisman, 1969). The key idea in these articles was that information processing could be divided into con~ trolled and automatic modes. Controlled process~ ing was defined as demanding attention, limited in capacity, and voluntarily initiated and altered. Automatic processing was ”
- Unraveling the Processes Underlying Evaluation: Attitudes from the Perspective of the Ape Model (2007, background): “…measures that have also been adopted in research on attitudes (for reviews, see Fazio & Olson, 2003; Petty, Fazio, & Briñol, in press; Wittenbrink & Schwarz, 2007).1 These measures differ from traditional self–report measures, such that they do not require an explicit evaluation of an object.”
- Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: A review and introduction (2014, background): “This perspective turns contextual influences on judgment and choice from deplorable “context dependency” into laudable “context sensitivity”, with far reaching consequences for the conceptualization of preferences, attitudes, and related concepts (for a discussion, see Schwarz, 2007).”
- What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users (2013, background): “Accessibility is increased by extensive activation of information (Schwarz, 2007) and by higher associative strength (e.g., caused by more frequent simultaneous activation) between information and the object under judgment (Collins and Loftus, 1975).”
- Why researchers should think "real-time": A cognitive rationale. (2012, background): “stability as well as change in attitude reports and predicts when attitude judgments will or will not relate to later behavioral decisions (for reviews see Lord & Lepper, 1999; Schwarz, 2007).”