Intellectual capital performance drivers in the Greek banking sector

By D. Mavridis, Pantelis Kyrmizoglou. 2005

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/357d5984550324393613ce029b4d6db2c3ee558f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Determinants of financial performance of Islamic banks: An intellectual capital perspective (2017, result): “These findings are consistent with earlier studies (Goh, 2005; Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou, 2005; Mention and Bontis, 2013), which reported that human IC contributes both directly and indirectly to business performance in the banking sector.”
Investigating the value and efficiency of intellectual capital (2007, background): “), 17 main Greek banks ( Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou, 2005”
A study of determinants of intellectual capital performance in banks: the UK case (2008, background): ““An intangible asset with the potential to create value for the enterprise and the society itself” as stated by Mavridis (2005, p. 43)”
Intellectual capital performance in the banking sector: An assessment of Australian owned banks (2010, methodology): “However, the sample size is consistent with other studies conducted on the IC performance of the banking sector such as Greece with 17 banks (Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou, 2005), Malaysia with 16 banks (Goh, 2005) and Istanbul (Yalama and Coskun, 2007) with 17 banks.”
The impact of the intellectual capital efficiency on commercial banks performance: Evidence from the US (2016, background): “4 We are aware that replying this question is of special interest because the banking industry is one of the most knowledge-intensive industries (Firer and Williams, 2003; Mavridis, 2005) and represents an ideal setting for research on IC.”
The impact of intellectual capital on firms' market value and financial performance (2011, background): “, 2008), a considerable number of scholars and practitioners identify three basic components of IC; human capital, structural capital and customer (relational) capital (Bontis, 1998; Edvinsson, 1997; Holton and Yamkovenko, 2008; Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou, 2005; Ruta, 2009; Tayles et al., 2007; Yang a”
Impact of intellectual capital on organisational performance: An empirical study of companies in the Hang Seng Index (Part 1) (2009, methodology): “VAIC™ has been used outside Hong Kong to study, for example, the Austrian banking sector, the Greek banking sector and listed companies in the UK ( Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou, 2005”
Intellectual capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector (2013, unknown): “…and other organisations in several countries (e.g. Bornemann, 1999; Cabrita and Vaz, 2005; Chen et al., 2005; Firer and Williams, 2003; Goh, 2005; Kujansivu, 2005; Kujansivu and Lonnqvist, 2007; Mavridis, 2003a, b, c, 2004, 2005; Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou, 2005; Shiu, 2006; Tseng and Goo, 2005).”
Intellectual capital performance of quoted banks on the Istanbul stock exchange market (2007, background): “The related evidence of VAIC has been growing in the literature (Bornemann, 1999; Firer and Williams, 2003; Mavridis, 2004, 2005; Ming-Chin Chen et al., 2005; Goh, 2005; Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou, 2005; Shiu, 2006).”
Intellectual Capital Performance and Profitability of Banks: Evidence from Pakistan (2019, background): “VAIC: A number of recent and earlier studies applied VAIC to measure the IC performance of the banking sector in different countries, including Greece (Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou 2005), Austria (Pulic 2000), Croatia (Pulic 2001), India (Kamath 2007), Australia (Joshi et al. 2010), Japan (Mavridis 2004”