Intellectual capital performance in the banking sector: An assessment of Australian owned banks

By Mahesh Chandra Joshi, D. Cahill, J. Sidhu. 2010

200 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1931ec8fbc417c4c24fb874eb16a571a0f7e585f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. A. Alhassan
2. M. Al-Musali
3. K. Ismail
4. N. Asare

In Strategy and Management

1. A. Alhassan
2. N. Asare
3. M. Al-Musali
4. K. Ismail
5. D. Cahill
6. Monika Kansal
7. Mahesh Chandra Joshi
8. J. Sidhu

Citations in the corpus

• Intellectual Capital and its Effect on Financial Performance of Banks: Evidence from Saudi Arabia (2014, methodology): “Consistent with previous studies (see Al-Musali and Ku Ismail, 2012; Abdulsalam et al., 2011; Joshi, Cahill, and Sidhu, 2010), this study employed the value added intellectual coefficient (VAIC) method of Pulic (1998) to measure IC performance.”
• Intellectual capital and bank productivity in emerging markets: evidence from Ghana (2016, methodology): “Joshi et al. (2010) alluded to the view that, at this juncture, there is no impeccable method existing for measuring intellectual capital.”
• Intellectual capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector (2013, methodology): “The IC performance of the financial sector in Australia is highly influenced by HCE, which is similar to results reported by earlier research by Goh (2005) and Joshi et al. (2010).”