Intellectual capital performance of quoted banks on the Istanbul stock exchange market

By A. Yalama, M. Coşkun. 2007

198 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/43a07e06762833086bb8ceb789a2a064b6fc8931

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Neha Smriti
2. N. Das
3. Mahesh Chandra Joshi
4. D. Cahill
5. J. Sidhu
6. Monika Kansal
7. A. Alhassan
8. Anis Maaloul

In Strategy and Management

1. Neha Smriti
2. N. Das
3. Mahesh Chandra Joshi
4. D. Cahill
5. J. Sidhu
6. Monika Kansal
7. A. Alhassan
8. N. Asare

Citations in the corpus

• The impact of intellectual capital on firm performance: a study of Indian firms listed in COSPI (2018, methodology): “A study conducted by Yalama and Coskun (2007) to examine the influence of IC and their sub-components on the profitability of Istanbul banks and observed a significant role of IC compared to CEE.”
• Intellectual capital and financial performance: an evaluation of the Australian financial sector (2013, background): “Yalama and Coskun (2007) analysed the IC performance of banks listed on the Istanbul Stock Exchange and found a positive relationship between IC and financial returns.”
• Analysing value added as an indicator of intellectual capital and its consequences on company performance (2010, methodology): “However, an increasingly large number of researchers (such as Chen et al., 2005; Shiu, 2006; Kujansivu and Lonnqvist, 2007; Tan et al., 2007; Yalama and Coskun, 2007; Kamath, 2007, 2008; Chan, 2009) adopted the VAICe method which remains, in their view, the most attractive among the suggested…”
• Ownership Structure and Intellectual Capital Performance in Malaysia (2009, unknown): “It is also interesting to note that the banking sector is found to be a central concern of VAIC™ studies, as the sector is considered to be knowledge-inclined (e.g., Mavridis, 2004, 2005; Goh, 2005; Kamath, 2007; Yalama & Coskun, 2007).”
• The impact of the intellectual capital efficiency on commercial banks performance: Evidence from the US (2016, methodology): “Using the VAICTM methodology as a measure of IC efficiency, Yalama and Coskun (2007) analyse the impact of IC on bank profitability in a study of Turkish banks.”
• Invested resource, competitive intellectual capital, and corporate performance (2010, result): “According to the results of Kamath (2007), Yalama and Coskun (2007) and Ting and Lean (2009), human capital is important factor for company and has a positive relationship with the firm’s performance.”
• Intellectual capital performance of financial institutions in Malaysia (2009, result): “According to the results of Yalama and Coskun (2007)”
• Intellectual Capital Performance and Profitability of Banks: Evidence from Pakistan (2019, background): “The evidence in support of VAIC has grown in existing literature (Bontis et al. 2000; Cabrita and Vaz 2006; Cabrita et al. 2017; Joshi et al. 2010; Kamath 2007; Mavridis 2004; Mavridis and Kyrmizoglou 2005; Meles et al. 2016; Mondal and Ghosh 2012; Nawaz and Haniffa 2017; Yalama and Coskun 2007).”
• Intellectual capital and bank productivity in emerging markets: evidence from Ghana (2016, background): “Some studies do find significance evidence to support the change in performance of firms that is attributable to VAIC (see Cabrita and Vaz, 2006; Saengchan, 2007; Mondal and Ghosh, 2012); even though Yalama and Coskun (2007)’s findings is contrary.”