Can Russia's state-managed, network capitalism be competitive?: Institutional pull versus institutional push

By Sheila M. Puffer, Daniel J. McCarthy. 2007

162 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34319b4226da0be7bdc9669f0bd897c836e835f5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Political Science and International Relations

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

State Control and Corporate Governance in Transition Economies: 25 Years on from 1989 (2016, unknown): “When Mr. Putin came to power, he offered to accept oligarchs’ ownership rights obtained through the opaque privatization process if they did not get involved in politics (Puffer & McCarthy, 2007).”
The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. (2009, unknown): “For example, in the wake of political collapse in the former Soviet Union, numerous Russian entrepreneurs attempted to launch and survive by relying on social ties and connections (known as blat ) within their local networks (Puffer & Mc-Carthy, 2007).”
Institutional Strategies in Emerging Markets (2015, background): “…wherein social norms, trust, and personal ties are critical in facilitating cooperation and regulation of social behavior (Peng et al., 2008; Chung, 2006; Kostova & Roth, 2002; Luo & 21 Chung, 2005; Puffer & McCarthy, 2007; Webb, Tihanyi, Ireland, & Sirmon, 2009; Zhu & Chung, forthcoming).”
Does Institutional Reform of Intellectual Property Rights Lead to More Inbound FDI? Evidence from Latin America and the Caribbean (2011, unknown): “Government policy plays a direct role in facilitating innovation activities and the capability for greater economic prosperity (Lu et al., 2008; Puffer & McCarthy, 2007).”
Human Capital and CEO Compensation during Institutional Transitions (2015, unknown): “During the transitions, these individuals are often able to manoeuvre into newer and more lucrative positions of power and wealth (Puffer and McCarthy, 2007).”
Theories of the (state-owned) firm (2016, background): “…in CEE—a euphemism for the SOEs to remain BSOEs^ with some private participation—Bis surprisingly effective^ (Djankov & Murrell, 2002: 741).6 The outcome has been that many countries, such as Russia, are now shifting toward significant revival of state control of firms (Puffer & McCarthy, 2007).”
Entrepreneurship in Russia and China: The Impact of Formal Institutional Voids (2010, background): “…of the difficulties entrepreneurs in transition economies face due to the weaknesses in their countries’ formal institutions, a construct that has been analyzed in numerous works about business in those settings (e.g., Hoskisson, Eden, Lau, & Wright, 2000; Peng, 2000; Puffer & McCarthy, 2007).”
The effects of social capital and organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts (2008, background): “Irrespective of the approach taken, government involvement remains heavy in transition economies (Boisot & Child, 1988; Buck et al., 2000; Child & Tse, 2001; Kornai, 1992; Puffer & McCarthy, 2007; Thun, 2006; Walder, 1995).”