Using Enrichment Reading Practices to Increase Reading Fluency, Comprehension, and Attitudes
By Sally M. Reis, R. Eckert, D. McCoach, Joan K. Jacobs, Michael D. Coyne. 2008
94 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Information Systems, Statistics and Probability
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/34277847f24b0adbc397b03c70ed418074168555
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Statistics and Probability
- Dana Algeo-Nichols
- Sally M. Reis
- Joseph S. Renzulli
- Glenn T. Colby
- Kelly Puzio
- D. McCoach
- J. Adelson
Citations in the corpus
- The Effects of Differentiated Instruction and Enrichment Pedagogy on Reading Achievement in Five Elementary Schools (2011, result): “In previous experimental studies, the SEM-R has been shown to be effective at increasing reading comprehension and fluency scores for elementary students in a smaller, geographically limited sample of schools, with results suggesting that urban, high-poverty students benefitted from this interventio”
- Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research (2010, background): “While not all forms of pedagogy can be extended to all students, some reading and technology enrichment programs (Field, 2009; Reis et al., 2007, 2008), some content based enrichment (VanTassel-Baska et al., 2002), and some differentiation and enrichment project-based learning have been found to…”
- Differentiated Literacy Instruction: Boondoggle or Best Practice? (2020, methodology): “Because every study but one (Reis et al., 2008) implemented literacy differentiation to a naturally occurring classroom of students, observed sample sizes were adjusted to account for clustering (Hedges, 2004a, 2004b, 2007).”