Monitoring Implementation of Reciprocal Peer Tutoring: Identifying and Intervening With Students Who Do Not Maintain Accurate Implementation

81 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process (2012, background): “that were developed through training (Durlak and DuPre 2008). The key notion here is that support is on-going, including monitoring and evaluating the implementation process: Durlak and DuPre (2008) argue that this is necessary for implementing innovations.”
Implementation Matters: A Review of Research on the Influence of Implementation on Program Outcomes and the Factors Affecting Implementation (2008, background): “A detailed listing of the studies supporting the importance of each factor is available from the first author on request been successful in many studies (e.g., Dufrene et al. 2005; Sterling-Turner et al. 2002).”
Advancing the Science and Practice of Social and Emotional Learning (2016, result): “, 2012), provided additional evidence consistent with Durlak et al.’s (2011) findings.”