The Quality Implementation Framework: A Synthesis of Critical Steps in the Implementation Process
By Duncan C. Meyers, J. Durlak, A. Wandersman. American Journal of Community Psychology, 2012
1,035 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29cd4466ac3c2a5e939dc85e8b3c0d9cb6b58b47
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
- Laura J. Damschroder
- P. Nilsen
- Jeffrey L. Smith
- Andrew Booth
- Amy E. Cassata
- Jeanne Century
- Fiona Seaton
- Geoffrey Curran
Citations in the corpus
- Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework (2017, methodology): “approaches, such as the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework or the PRECEDE-PROCEED framework [11] can thus be considered evaluation frameworks, whereas the Stetler Model or the Quality Implementation Framework [12] can be classified as process models.”
- An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist (2015, background): “They may also provide a prescriptive series of steps summarizing how implementation should ideally be planned and carried out [13, 45].”
- Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks (2015, methodology): “There are also numerous examples of similar “how-to-implement” models that have emerged from other fields, including models developed by Grol and Wensing [53], Pronovost et al. [54] and the Quality Implementation Framework [27], all of which are intended to provide support for planning and managing ”
- Implementation Research (2016, background): “…factor category is described in various ways, including implementation drivers (Fixsen et al., 2005), implementation-level activities (Darrow, 2013), support systems (Domitrovich et al., 2008; Meyers et al., 2012), strategies (Moulin et al., 2015), and implementation practices (Dunst et al., 2013).”
- A practical implementation science heuristic for organizational readiness: R = MC2 (2015, neutral): “Practical implementation science Scientific study of the translation of empirical implementation findings into user-friendly resources (Meyers et al., 2012b) Proactive implementation supports The use of tools, training, technical assistance, and quality assurance and improvement processes to build…”