Comparison of Retention Rates Using Traditional, Drill Sandwich, and Incremental Rehearsal Flash Card Methods

By L. L. MacQuarrie, J. A. Tucker, M. Burns, Brian D. Hartman. 2002

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/330187e183226cbd0addcfff2d96c74e80f2e5e3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Christopher H. Skinner
2. Laurice M. Joseph
3. L. Nist
4. Brian C. Poncy
5. Theodore J. Christ
6. Eric J. Billington

In Education

1. Christopher H. Skinner
2. Laurice M. Joseph
3. L. Nist
4. Theodore J. Christ

In Language and Linguistics

1. Christopher H. Skinner

Citations in the corpus

• Effectiveness and Efficiency of Flashcard Drill Instructional Methods on Urban First-Graders' Word Recognition, Acquisition, Maintenance, and Generalization (2008, result): “Previous research compared incremental rehearsal to a traditional and a drill sandwich method, and the findings revealed that the incremental rehearsal procedure was the most effective for retention of word recognition (MacQuarrie-Klender et al., 2002).”
• Theoretical and Applied Implications of Precisely Measuring Learning Rates (2008, background): “Confirming previous research, Nist and Joseph found greater increases in learning levels under the IR procedure (Burns et al., 2004; MacQuarrie-Klender et al., 2002).”