Measuring network competence: some international evidence (Измерение компетенции сети фирм: несколько международных примеров)
By Thomas Ritter, Ian Wilkinson. 2002
285 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/32903029baac4a45fa84c4415f78bb9ab79a14d3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- S. Mouzas
- K. Vandenbempt
- Thomas Ritter
- Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro
- Ian Wilkinson
- P. Naudé
- Wesley J. Johnston
- L. Berghman
In Strategy and Management
- Thomas Ritter
- Wesley J. Johnston
- S. Mouzas
- K. Vandenbempt
- Jesús J. Cambra‐Fierro
- Ian Wilkinson
- P. Naudé
- L. Berghman
Citations in the corpus
- Unpicking the meaning of value in key account management (2006, background): “Managing and marketing in dyadic and complex relationships constitutes an important “network competence” of companies (Ritter, 1999; Ritter et al., 2002).”
- Value innovation in business markets: Breaking the industry recipe (2006, background): “The transformation and exploitation of new value creation efforts implies network competencies ( Ritter, Wilkinson, & Johnston, 2002 ).”
- Inter‐firm market orientation as antecedent of knowledge transfer, innovation and value creation in networks (2011, background): “There are also studies, which propose the transition from interfirm dyadic relationships to strategic partnerships and networks (Butler, 2010; Rahman and Korn, 2010; Dodourova, 2009; Ploetner and Ehert, 2006; Ritter and Gemünden, 2003a; Ritter et al., 2002).”
- Managing in complex business networks (2004, background): “Regarding research, the task ahead is to fine-tune our understanding of networking capabilities, to develop good measures of them, and to empirically examine how they contribute to relationship and network development and the firms performance in different relationship and network contexts (Ritter, ”