The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search

By Keith Rayner. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2009

2,597 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29179bb4cb1e9cb0481c3e095f9331a331f162b2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

TIMED AND UNTIMED GRAMMATICALITY JUDGMENTS MEASURE DISTINCT TYPES OF KNOWLEDGE (2015, background): “…total-sentence length (range: 5–12 words) because this could infl uence the likelihood of a reader regressing (Kliegl, Grabner, Rolfs, & Engbert, 2004 ; Rayner, 1998 , 2009 ; Reichle et al., 2009 ; Vitu & McConkie, 2000 ) and, therefore, could potentially affect participants’ reading patterns.”
Processing of native and foreign language subtitles in films: An eye tracking study (2012, result): “The average ﬁxation durations for the standard, intralingual, and reversed sub-titling conditions (227, 240, and 243 ms, respectively) were in line with the average ﬁxation duration (between 225 and 250 ms) for silent reading (Rayner, 1998, 2009).”
THE EFFECTS OF INPUT ENHANCEMENT ON GRAMMAR LEARNING AND COMPREHENSION (2013, background): “Readers sequentially fi x their eyes on individual words (Pollatsek, Reichle, & Rayner, 2006 ; Rayner, 1998 , 2009 ), and this saccadic movement from one word to another happens as readers recognize and process words (Reichle, Rayner, & Pollatsek, 2003 ).”
Self-Serving Justifications (2015, background): “To control for effects of the horizontal order in the display (e.g., due to reading directionality; Rayner, 2009), we also varied whether the value next to the target appeared to the left or right of the target.”
Eye movements in developing readers: A comparison of silent and oral sentence reading (2014, background): “…Blythe, Häkiö, Bertram, Liversedge, & Hyönä, 2011; Huestegge, Radach, Corbic, & Huestegge, 2009; Hyönä & Olson, 1995; Joseph, Liversedge, Blythe, White, & Rayner, 2009; Joseph, Nation, & Liversedge, 2013), and binocular coordination (Blythe, Liversedge, Joseph, White, Findaly, & Rayner, 2006).”
Visual Attention and Attribute Attendance in Multi-Attribute Choice Experiments (2015, background): “Therefore, examining eye-movements can be potentially important in understanding information acquisition (Rayner, 2009, McSorley and McCloy, 2009, and McSorley et al., 2009).”
Teacher vision: expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes (2016, background): “A person’s event-structured knowledge about a particular kind of scene, such as a classroom, governs where the eyes move, even controlling the very first movement as one begins to perceive a scene (Henderson 2011; Rayner 2009).”
Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? (2016, background): “Beginning readers or less-skilled readers exhibit longer fixations, shorter saccades, and more refixations than skilled readers (Rayner, 2009).”
Influences of grammatical and stereotypical gender during reading: eye movements in pronominal and noun phrase anaphor resolution (2014, background): “…a way of clarifying mechanisms that underlie language comprehension (for more technical details and background information on eye movements, see Rayner, 2009).2 The eye-tracking studies on anaphor resolution reported above mostly addressed gender processing in English and used reflexive…”
Developmental Changes in Eye Movements and Visual Information Encoding Associated With Learning to Read (2014, background): “There is a substantial literature on eye movements during reading (i.e., 483 references cited in Rayner, 2009, although some of these relate to nonreading tasks).”
A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012 (2013, methodology): “According to Rayner (1998, 2009), a fixation generally ranges from 100 to 500 ms, depending on the viewed materials.”