A review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman's paradox
By M. Nickel, Manuel Cano Rodríguez. 2002
144 citations recorded by the source corpus.
A cornerstone in finance theory continues to be the positive relationship between risk and return in spite of Fama and French (The Journal of Finance 47(2) (1992) 427-65) and several later papers finding no relationship between the two variables. Twelve years earlier, Bowman (Sloan Management Review 1980, pp. 17-31) studied the same relationship from organization theory, achieving similar results with accounting data, and developing a whole research stream known as "Bowman's paradox". This stream has contributed to some curious and interesting ideas that could also be applied to other different streams: new risk measures, managerial goal selection, response to the decline in the organization, diversification strategy on risk and return, among others. Similar to the financial stream, a number of researchers have tried to study this issue from the strategic management perspective. Their inconclusive results have generated a considerable controversy, keeping this research stream alive. In this work, we describe and explore this phenomenon from "Bowman's paradox", theoretical explanations, criticisms and future orientations.
Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ed487fdf94a4c368418337c44c307d49f21e2ec
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Linda Argote
- Henrich R. Greve
- Pino G. Audia
- George A. Shinkle
- Philip Bromiley
- J. Eggers
- Aseem Kaul
- Ji-Yub Kim
In Strategy and Management
- Linda Argote
- Henrich R. Greve
- Pino G. Audia
- George A. Shinkle
- William Ocasio
- Ella Miron-Spektor
- Philip Bromiley
- Jared D. Harris
Citations in the corpus
- Less Likely to Fail: Low Performance, Firm Size, and Factory Expansion in the Shipbuilding Industry (2006, background): “Most studies adopting this theoretical perspective suggest that, when performance is above the aspiration level, increases in performance decrease risk taking (Bromiley et al. 2001, Nickel and Rodriguez 2002).”
- Managerial Risk Taking (2016, unknown): “As some scholars have noted (e.g., Nickel & Rodriguez, 2002), managerial risktaking behaviors may ultimately impact organizational risk, mostly captured in the variance of the firm’s future income stream.”
- Corporate Life Cycle and Cost of Equity Capital (2015, unknown): “Hence, introduction and decline firms cannot raise capital unless investors are properly compensated (Nickel and Rodriguez, 2002), which effectively increases the cost of equity.”
- Management Theory Applications of Prospect Theory: Accomplishments, Challenges, and Opportunities (2011, unknown): “Of course, if firms are not using the reference point researchers assume, results that appear to support PT may not do so (Nickel & Rodriguez, 2002).”
- A Behavioral Theory of the Firm - 40 Years and Counting: Introduction and Impact (2007, background): “A recent review reported many empirical studies on this topic and good support for the behavioral theory of the firm (Nickel and Rodriguez 2002).”