A review of research on the negative accounting relationship between risk and return: Bowman's paradox

By M. Nickel, Manuel Cano Rodríguez. 2002

144 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A cornerstone in finance theory continues to be the positive relationship between risk and return in spite of Fama and French (The Journal of Finance 47(2) (1992) 427-65) and several later papers finding no relationship between the two variables. Twelve years earlier, Bowman (Sloan Management Review 1980, pp. 17-31) studied the same relationship from organization theory, achieving similar results with accounting data, and developing a whole research stream known as "Bowman's paradox". This stream has contributed to some curious and interesting ideas that could also be applied to other different streams: new risk measures, managerial goal selection, response to the decline in the organization, diversification strategy on risk and return, among others. Similar to the financial stream, a number of researchers have tried to study this issue from the strategic management perspective. Their inconclusive results have generated a considerable controversy, keeping this research stream alive. In this work, we describe and explore this phenomenon from "Bowman's paradox", theoretical explanations, criticisms and future orientations.

Subfields: Accounting, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2ed487fdf94a4c368418337c44c307d49f21e2ec

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

  1. Linda Argote
  2. Henrich R. Greve
  3. Pino G. Audia
  4. George A. Shinkle
  5. Philip Bromiley
  6. J. Eggers
  7. Aseem Kaul
  8. Ji-Yub Kim

In Strategy and Management

  1. Linda Argote
  2. Henrich R. Greve
  3. Pino G. Audia
  4. George A. Shinkle
  5. William Ocasio
  6. Ella Miron-Spektor
  7. Philip Bromiley
  8. Jared D. Harris

Citations in the corpus