Effects of preschool phoneme identity training after six years: Outcome level distinguished from rate of response.
By Brian Byrne, Ruth Fielding-barnsley, Luise Ashley. 2000
209 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2d4baceed98fd06e8c78edfea1abed2e794e63f5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- K. Harris
- Steve Graham
- Douglas Fuchs
- Lynn S. Fuchs
- Stefan Samuelsson
- E. Caffrey
- Brian Byrne
- R. Olson
In Education
- K. Harris
- Steve Graham
- Lynn S. Fuchs
- Douglas Fuchs
- A. Aitken
- Brendan Bartlett
- Ashley Barkel
- C. Kavanaugh
Citations in the corpus
- Genetic and environmental influences on early literacy (2006, background): “We sought, too, to assess the children’s learning potential, both within the domain of phonological awareness and more generally, prompted by evidence that how quickly children respond at a particular stage of literacy instruction serves as a good predictor of subsequent growth rates ( Byrne, Fieldi”
- Assessment and Early Instruction of Preschool Children at Risk for Reading Disability. (2005, methodology): “…PROGRAM The intervention was based on a prereading program entitled Sound Foundations, designed by Byrne and Fielding-Barnsley (1991b) and evaluated in a longitudinal project following a group of children from preschool to Grade 5 (Byrne & Fielding-Barnsley, 1991a, 1993a, 1995; Byrne et al., 2000).”
- Longitudinal twin study of early reading development in three countries: Preliminary results (2002, background): “Further, Byrne, Fielding-Barnsley, and Ashley (2000) showed that in those randomly selected preschoolers, responsiveness to the instruction, measured in terms of how quickly each child grasped the notion of phoneme identity, was a good predictor of school progress in reading, even after six years.”
- Reading for Writing: A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Reading Interventions on Writing (2017, methodology): “For follow-up assessments by Byrne and Fielding-Barnsley (1993, 1995) and Byrne et al. (2000) and Ecalle et al. (2009), ESs were averaged across time points.”
- Questions people ask about the role of phonological processes in learning to read (2004, background): “Numerous studies indicate that systematic instruction can instil rudimentary phoneme awareness in most children who are initially lacking awareness, including many at special risk for reading disability (Ball & Blachman, 1991; Blachman, 2000; Byrne, Fielding-Barnsely & Ashley, 2000 ).”
- The Predictive Validity of Dynamic Assessment (2008, methodology): “Nine studies did not report Pearson’s correlation coefficients: 6 studies with contingent feedback (Budoff et al., 1976; Byrne et al., 2000; Meijer, 1993; Peña et al., 1992; Samuels et al., 1992; Swanson, 1994) and 3 studies with noncontingent feedback (Bain & Olswang, 1995; Budoff et al.”