Collaborating to Compete

By Wilfred Amaldoss, R. Meyer, Jagmohan Singh Raju, Amnon Rapoport. 2000

300 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management Science and Operations Research, Safety Research

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cc9a3fe54ea0d93f8c793be80fccad61cdbf9c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management Science and Operations Research

In Safety Research

Citations in the corpus

Working with Rivals: The Impact of Competitor Alliances on Financial Performance (2007, background): “Recently, several scholars have suggested that firms can maximize their financial performance by blending competition with cooperation (e.g., Amaldoss et al. 2000; Brandenberger and Nalebuff 1996; Luo, Slotegraaf, and Pan 2006; Sheth and Sisodia 1999).”
Behavior in Group Contests: A Review of Experimental Research (2015, background): “There are three studies by Amaldoss et al. (2000), Gunnthorsdottir and Rapoport (2006), and Kugler et al. (2010), which directly compare the egalitarian rule (αA = 1) to the proportional rule (αA = 0).”
Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures (2001, background): “Over the past two decades there has been a surge in the number of international joint ventures (IJVs) as firms have strived to become more globally interconnected (Bleeke and Ernst, 1993; Hennart, 1991; Lorange and Roos, 1993; Mjoen and Tallman, 1997).”
Pricing of Conspicuous Goods: A Competitive Analysis of Social Effects (2005, methodology): “, Smith 1982, Ghosh and John 2000, Amaldoss et al. 2000, Srivastava et al. 2000). The experimental results provide strong support for a key prediction of the model: more snobs buy a product as its price increases. Related Literature. Our work is related to the marketing literature on the role of pro”
A survey of experimental research on contests, all-pay auctions and tournaments (2014, background): “Behavior in group contests with an auction CSF has been examined experimentally by Amaldoss et al. (2000), although they specify that no player wins a prize in the event of a tie. They consider contests played by teams of two players. Each alliance’s pure strategy space has three possible effort lev”
The Relqual Scale: A Measure of Relationship Quality in Export Market Ventures (2005, background): “Communication can be considered to be the most important element in successful interfirm exchange as “the most carefully designed relationship will crumble without good, frequent communication” (Bleeke and Ernst, 1993: 14).”
Interfirm Cooperation and Customer Orientation (2003, background): “, Bucklin and Sengupta 1993; Morgan and Hunt 1994), resourcecommitment decisions (Amaldoss et al. 2000), and new product–related outcomes (e.”
Designing Price Contracts for Boundedly Rational Customers: Does the Number of Blocks Matter? (2007, background): “(See Amaldoss et al. 2000, Amaldoss and Jain 2002, Amaldoss and Rapoport 2005, Srivastava et al. 2000 for examples of such success in marketing.)”
Production, Manufacturing and Logistics Impact of product pricing and timing of investment decisions on supply chain co-opetition (2007, background): “A variety of mechanisms have been studied to improve supply chain efficiency including buy-back agreements (Pasternack, 1985), quantity commitment contracts (Anupindi and Bassok, 1999), and information sharing (Gavirneni et al., 1999).”
Effort, Revenue, and Cost Sharing Mechanisms for Collaborative New Product Development (2009, background): “…management literature considers institutional alliances but ignores the role of uncertainty in development decision making (Dutta and Weiss 1997, Amaldoss et al. 2000), or limits itself to institutional alliances and the challenge of integrating cultures in such ventures (Doz and Hamel 1998).”