When and How Does Business Group Affiliation Promote Firm Innovation? A Tale of Two Emerging Economies

By Sea-Jin Chang, Chi‐Nien Chung, Ishtiaq P. Mahmood. Organ. Sci., 2006

374 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2cb81d33f1ab7836bcdd15cb93b139c9e4e69cca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

Citations in the corpus

Decomposability in Knowledge Structures and Its Impact on the Usefulness of Inventions and Knowledge-base Malleability (2008, methodology): “For robustness, we also estimated “pre-sample” fixedeffect estimators (Blundell, Griffith, and Van Reenen, 1995; Chang, Chung, and Mahmood, 2006) for both equations.”
Where can capabilities come from? network ties and capability acquisition in business groups (2011, background): “…as business groups have often been characterized as important technology importers and creators in many emerging economies (Amsden and Hikino, 1994; Chang, Chung, and Mahmood, 2006) and by analyzing the role of varied intragroup network ties as conduits for information and resources, we seek to…”
State Ownership and Firm Innovation in China: An Integrated View of Institutional and Efficiency Logics (2017, background): “As governments devise policies to encourage or discourage certain types of development, SOEs can access important infrastructure resources and enjoy the privileged incentives that facilitate government-initiated innovation (Chang, Chung, and Mahmood, 2006; Siegel, 2007).”
Institutional Voids or Organizational Resilience? Business Groups, Innovation, and Market Development in Latin America (2015, background): “A few studies have recently extended the business groups’ literature to analyze whether group-affiliated firms (GAFs) are more innovative than standalone firms (SAFs) (Belenzon & Berkovitz, 2010; Chang et al., 2006; Mahmood & Lee, 2004; Mahmood & Mitchell, 2004; Mahmood et al., 2011).”
Business groups in developing capital markets: Towards a complementarity perspective (2015, background): “E-mail: raveendra_chittoor@isb.edu Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. of business group affiliation vary with the quality of the institutional environments in which they are located (e.g., Carney et al., 2011; Chang, Chung, and Mahmood, 2006; Hoskisson et al., 2005).”
Partner Geographic and Organizational Proximity and the Innovative Performance of Knowledge‐Creating Alliances (2014, positive): “, internal labor markets for knowledge workers) that facilitate knowledge integration (Mahmood and Mitchell, 2004; Chang et al., 2006).”
Third-World Copycats to Emerging Multinationals: Institutional Changes and Organizational Transformation in the Indian Pharmaceutical Industry (2009, background): “Group-affiliated firms are in a position to leverage linkages with other group companies to attain technological partners, suppliers, and other intermediaries and access domestic technology inputs (Chang et al. 2006).”