Collective psychological ownership within the work and organizational context: Construct introduction and elaboration

By J. L. Pierce, Iiro Jussila. 2010

398 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2a8420b2953be7e0d98f152f7d893fc4a7ee382a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. He Peng
2. M. O’driscoll
3. Fabian Bernhard
4. Joshua Paundra
5. W. Ketter
6. Jan van Dalen
7. Laurens Rook
8. Jing Jian Xiao

In Social Psychology

1. He Peng
2. Fabian Bernhard
3. M. O’driscoll
4. Laurens Rook
5. Joshua Paundra
6. W. Ketter
7. Jan van Dalen
8. Jing Jian Xiao

Citations in the corpus

• Why and when do people hide knowledge? (2013, background): “Since territoriality is mostly driven by a self-serving motive and may do harm to organizations, employees with a high ownership feeling for the organization will in turn inhibit the negative effects of territoriality via OBSE.”
• Individual Psychological Ownership: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications for Research in Marketing (2015, neutral): “In doing so, our focus is on the individual rather than collective level, which has also been theoretically covered (e.g., Pierce and Jussila, 2010, 2011; Rantanen and Jussila, 2011).”
• Turning Agents into Psychological Principals: Aligning Interests of Non‐Owners Through Psychological Ownership (2013, neutral): “, 2005) or even as a collective phenomenon (Pierce and Jussila, 2010).”
• Handbook of Consumer Finance Research (2008, background): “that each individual within the couple sees themselves as an entrepreneur; a collective cognition needs to form and the couple must become aware of t he existence of the “us” in the copreneurial couple (Pierce & Jussila, 2010 ).”
• Preferences for car sharing services: Effects of instrumental attributes and psychological ownership (2017, background): “Pierce and Jussila (2010) first suggested that psychological ownership could be a group-level construct, and it would make sense to explore the role of group-level psychological ownership for a special branch of car sharing services aiming at attracting M AN US CR IP T AC CE PT ED ACCEPTED…”
• Job- and organization-based psychological ownership: Relationship and outcomes (2015, background): “Drawing upon Pierce et al. (2003), people come to ownership feelings, in part, through the exercise of control over and investment of the self into the target of ownership.”
• Psychological Ownership in Small Family-Owned Businesses: Leadership Style and Nonfamily-Employees’ Work Attitudes and Behaviors (2011, background): “Understanding ownership as a psychological phenomenon in organizational settings has gained speed in recent years and the concept of psychological ownership has been the focus of recent research (Avey et al., 2009; Brown, Lawrence, & Robinson, 2005; Pierce et al., 2009; Pierce & Jussila, 2010).”