A Bird’s-eye view of learner corpus research
By Sylviane Granger. 2002
318 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29feedc2d1b60eda6f27380dacd3036df561486a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
- Viktoria V. Driagina
- Aneta Pavlenko
- N. Vyatkina
- Ute Römer
- Julie A. Belz
- Jean–Marc Dewaele
- Robert O'Dowd
- C. Harris
In Literature and Literary Theory
Citations in the corpus
- An update on discourse functions and syntactic complexity in synchronous and asynchronous communication (2016, unknown): “Following this new strand of research, Kreyer and Schaub (2015) undertook an empirical, corpus-based study of the acquisition of phrasal complexity in intermediate learner language based on the Marburg corpus of intermediate learner English, a longitudinal corpus of written exam texts produced by Ge”
- Russian Emotion Vocabulary in American Learners’ Narratives (2007, background): “approach offers students more active and responsible roles than traditional present-practiceproduce paradigms (Granger, 2002; Seidlhofer, 2002), which is of particular importance for such a personal and subjective topic as the expression of feelings.”
- Learner Corpus Analysis and the Development of L2 Pragmatic Competence in Networked Inter-cultural Language Study: The Case of German Modal Particles (2005, background): “Thus, very few learner corpora contain longitudinal data from the same set of learners (such as those in Telekorp) that can speak to developmental issues in second language acquisition (Granger, 2002, p. 11).”
- The Development of Second Language Writing Complexity in Groups and Individuals: A Longitudinal Learner Corpus Study (2012, background): “As Granger, Kraif, Ponton, Antoniadis, and Zampa (2007) note, the value of a learner corpus increases exponentially for both theoretical and applied second language acquisition (SLA) research purposes when it is annotated for parts of speech (POS) and other linguistic properties and analyzed with na”
- Corpus Research Applications in Second Language Teaching (2011, background): “…systematic computerized collections of the language produced by language learners, are also highly relevant for syllabus design (cf. Aston, 2000; Granger, 2002, 2009) since they provide insights on “the needs of specific learner populations” (Meunier, 2002, p. 125) and help to test teachers’…”