Hooking the reader: a corpus study of evaluative that in abstracts
By Ken Hyland, Polly Tse. 2005
372 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/29748a9413e1f02883177a933c2f5b647830db1d
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Bethany Gray
- Douglas Biber
- Feng Kevin Jiang
- A. Molino
- Ken Hyland
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Alison Wray
- Paul Baker
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Literature and Literary Theory
- Douglas Biber
- Bethany Gray
- A. Molino
- Feng Kevin Jiang
- Ken Hyland
- Raffaella Negretti
- Scott Andrew Crossley
- Paul Thompson
Citations in the corpus
- Metadiscursive nouns: Interaction and cohesion in abstract moves (2017, background): “Research has also focused on move structures (e.g. Dos Santos, 1996; Hyland, 2004; Lorés, 2004), and their linguistic features (e.g. Bondi & Lorés Sanz, 2014; Hyland & Tse, 2005).”
- As can be seen: Lexical bundles and disciplinary variation (2008, background): “…modifier fragments (the number of, the relationship between the, one of the most important), preposition + of phrase fragments (in terms of, on the basis of, at the beginning of the), as well as anticipatory it fragments (it can be, it was found that, it should be noted that) (Hyland & Tse, 2005).”
- Challenging stereotypes about academic writing: Complexity, elaboration, explicitness (2010, background): “292) Keen (2004) ‘‘Myhill (1999) identifies elaboration and use of subordination as features which tend to characterise high quality Grade A writing [.”
- Personal and Impersonal Authorial References: A Contrastive Study of English and Italian Linguistics Research Articles. (2010, background): “As many scholars have observed (MacDonald, 1992; Hyland, 2000; Becher and Trowler, 2001; Hyland and Tse, 2005) the decision to frame one's arguments in a rather objective and impersonal style is related to the epistemological beliefs of the disciplinary community which writers belong to.”