Competition and Corporate Governance in Transition

By Saul Estrin. 2002

259 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28f4f37d049a21975557530d1bb3d8f6a9eeabe1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Mike W. Peng
2. K. Meyer
3. Igor Filatotchev
4. Saul Estrin
5. Tony W. Tong
6. Justin Tan
7. T. Buck
8. Mike Wright

In Economics and Econometrics

1. K. Meyer
2. Mike W. Peng
3. Igor Filatotchev
4. Tony W. Tong
5. Justin Tan
6. Jozef Konings
7. T. Buck
8. Tomasz Mickiewicz

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Mike W. Peng
2. K. Meyer
3. Tomasz Mickiewicz
4. Saul Estrin
5. William Q. Judge
6. Jozef Konings
7. Thomas J. Douglas
8. Justin Tan

Citations in the corpus

• Institutional Antecedents of Corporate Governance Legitimacy (2008, background): “One of the consequences of emphasizing international competitiveness involves enhanced corporate governance (Estrin, 2002; Hoskisson, Yiu, & Kim, 2004; Weiland, 2005).”
• Institution building and growth in transition economies (2005, unknown): “30 Estrin, S., and G. Urga. (1997). “Testing for Ongoing Convergence in Central and Eastern Europe, 1970-95,” CEPR Discussion Paper 1616. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). (1998, 2001, 2002). Transition Report 1998, 2000, 2001. London, UK: EBRD. Engerman, S. L., and K. Sokolof”
• The Effects of Privatization and Competitive Pressure on Firms' Price-Cost Margins: Micro Evidence from Emerging Economies (2005, background): “While some papers show there is not much difference between these two categories because most of the privatization occurred through give away schemes, others demonstrate that privatization has led to better firm performance (Frydman et al, 1997; for an overview see Estrin, 2002). An alternative way ”
• Perspectives on multinational enterprises in emerging economies (2004, background): “the first years after privatisation (Djankov and Murrel, 2002; Estrin, 2002).”
• Institutions and Entrepreneurship Development in Russia: A Comparative Perspective (2008, background): “The literature also indicates that market-supporting institutions are especially problematic in Russia (Estrin, 2002).”
• Ownership Types and Strategic Groups in an Emerging Economy (2004, background): “Djankov and Murrell, 2002; Estrin, 2002; Estrin and Wright, 1999; Filatotchev et al., 1999; Wright et al., 2002).”
• Do outside directors and new managers help improve firm performance? An exploratory study in Russian privatization (2003, background): “…we now have a cumulative body of empirical knowledge from a variety of countries (reviewed by Megginson & Netter, 2001; Djankov & Murrell, 2002; Estrin, 2002; Havrylyshyn & McGettigan, 2000; Wright, Buck, & Filatotchev, 2002) suggesting the following three propositions concerning the…”
• Probing theoretically into Central and Eastern Europe: transactions, resources, and institutions (2005, methodology): “Tentatively, both Estrin (2002) and Djankov and Murrell (2002) attribute the poorer performance in countries such as Russia to the weaker institutional development.”
• Institutions, Resources, and Entry Strategies in Emerging Economies (2020, unknown): “However, efficiency of local markets is not always the norm (Estrin, 2002).”