Institutional Antecedents of Corporate Governance Legitimacy

By William Q. Judge, Thomas J. Douglas, Ali M. Kutan. 2008

245 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/062e345e7e7f99a880d254890cbaba083f8cf15c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Corporate social responsibility and innovative capacity: Intersection in a macro-level perspective (2018, unknown): “Taking into account that contextual-institutional conditions strongly determine organizational behavior (Hall and Soskice, 2001; Judge et al ., 2008), policy-makers could endorse CSR penetration through the configuration on innovation-adapted CSR policies, devised around the creation of reward…”
What drives mandatory and voluntary risk reporting variations across Germany, UK and US? (2015, unknown): “Based on the neo-institutional theory, Judge et al. (2008) argue that, the stronger are the laws within a”
Corporate Governance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures: Evidence from an Emerging Economy (2012, background): “Judge et al. (2008), in a cross-country research, identify the institution of law and order and less prevalent corruption as antecedents to corporate governance legitimacy.”
Seeking Legitimacy Through CSR: Institutional Pressures and Corporate Responses of Multinationals in Sri Lanka (2015, unknown): “Those studies which have looked at firm-level legitimacyseeking strategies have focused on other CSR-related practices such as corporate governance (Selekler-Goksen and Yildirim-Oktem 2009; Judge et al. 2008; Mason et al. 2007), environmental management practices (See for example Hoffman 1999; Bansa”
Islamic Governance, National Governance, and Bank Risk Management and Disclosure in MENA Countries (2017, background): “Social (country) level institutions provide a formal and informal platforms that provide legitimate models and standards of acceptable social behaviour (Judge et al., 2008, 2010).”
Corporate Governance and Performance in Socially Responsible Corporations: New Empirical Insights from a Neo‐Institutional Framework (2013, unknown): “Briefly, and at the top of Scott’s model are societal and global institutions, which provide a platform, where what is considered to be possible, acceptable and legitimate models and menus of social behaviour are officially proposed and informally passed (Judge et al., 2008, 2010).”
Good corporate governance in Nigeria: Antecedents, propositions and peculiarities (2015, background): “…(instrumentality) and legitimacy (symbolic) in explaining why firms may engage in good governance practices in an international business environment (Aguilera & Cuervo-Cazurra, 2004; Zattoni & Cuomo, 2008; Judge et al., 2008, 2010; McCarthy & Puffer 2008; Lien et al., 2005; Lau et.al., 2007).”
Formal and Informal Corruption Environments and Multinational Enterprise Social Irresponsibility (2015, unknown): “Governance and controls may help curtail irresponsible behaviour ( Judge et al., 2008; McGuire et al., 2012).”