A Test for Ethical Sensitivity in Science

By H. Clarkeburn. 2002

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Behavioral Ethics in Organizations: A Review (2006, unknown): “…Bebeau & Brabeck, 1987; Bebeau, Rest, & Yamoor, 1985), nursing (Lützén, Johansson, & Nordström, 2002), accounting (Shaub, Finn, & Munter, 1993; Yetmar & Eastman, 2000), education (Clarkeburn, 2002), marketing (Sparks & Hunt, 1998), and the insurance industry (Blodgett, Lu, Rose, & Vitell, 2001).”
13 Ethical Decision Making: Where We’ve Been and Where We’re Going (2008, background): “As Clarkeburn ( 2002 ) argued, most of the measures are more reflective of the ethical importance of an issue (cf.”
Moral Sensitivity in the Context of Socioscientific Issues in High School Science Students (2009, methodology): “Several studies have shown that moral sensitivity is a skill that can be improved upon by ethics education (Baab & Bebeau, 1990; Bebeau, Rest, & Yamoor, 1985; Bebeau & Brabeck, 1987; Clarkeburn, 2002; Myyry & Helkama, 2002).”
Socioscientific Issues as a Vehicle for Promoting Character and Values for Global Citizens (2013, methodology): “Ethical sensitivity is often defined in a similar way (Callahan, 1980; Clarkeburn, 2002).”