Time Pressure and Creativity in Organizations: A Longitudinal Field Study
By Teresa M. Amabile, Jennifer S. Mueller, W. B. Simpson, Constance Hadley, Steve J. Kramer, Lee Fleming. 2002
130 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/28a7a62ffd0090233a18202b744f9a0a726181c2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Carmen Binnewies
- Sabine Sonnentag
- Sandra Ohly
- Ute R. Hülsheger
- Neil Anderson
- Francesco Montani
- Arnold B. Bakker
- Sharon K. Parker
Citations in the corpus
- Task Rotation and Polychronicity: Effects on Individuals' Creativity (2006, background): “Amabile et al. (2002) examined the time pressure and creative cognitive processing (e.g., problem identification and idea generation) of 177 employees who were members of 22 project teams from seven organizations.”
- A literature review on HRM and innovation – taking stock and future directions (2017, background): “As it is individual employees, either alone or together in groups, who are the source of creative ideas and subsequent innovation (Anderson et al., 2004), the individual-level performance theories within HRM, most notably AMO (Lepak et al., 2006; Purcell et al., 2003), are in our view particularly r”
- Workplace duties or opportunities? Challenge stressors, regulatory focus, and creativity (2013, methodology): “However, in relation to challenge stressors (such as job demands and high responsibility), the research findings are inconsistent (e.g. Amabile et al., 2002; Janssen, 2000; Ohly & Fritz, 2010).”
- Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. (2009, background): “, 2000; Caldwell & O’Reilly, 2003; Clegg, Unsworth, Epitropaki, & Parker, 2002; Ohly, Sonnentag, & Pluntke, 2006) or independent ratings of innovation, which encompass supervisor ratings (Oldham & Cummings, 1996; West & Anderson, 1996), peer ratings (Amabile et al., 2002), and ratings by subject mat”
- Time pressure and team member creativity within R&D projects: The role of learning orientation and knowledge sourcing (2017, methodology): “…research could not empirically address this relevant issue, since most studies have focused primarily on the direct effects of time pressure on creativity, neglecting the cognitive and motivational processes with which time pressure may interact to affect creative outcomes (Amabile et al., 2002).”
- Taking personal initiative and communicating about ideas: What is important for the creative process and for idea creativity? (2007, background): “Idea creativity and its relationships with idea-related communication and personal initiative Creative behaviour often requires a deviation from the standard way of working (Ford, 1996) and an exploration of unfamiliar territory (Amabile et al., 2002).”
- Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors (2006, background): “E mail: s.ohly@tu bs.de”