Treatment Integrity and Therapeutic Change: Issues and Research Recommendations
By Francheska Perepletchikova, A. Kazdin. 2006
653 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/27f262f29279440ff83fae059d09067feb14f191
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- P. Kendall
- R. Beidas
- A. Kazdin
- Bryan G. Cook
- Christian A. Webb
- Peter Fonagy
- J. Barber
- Robert J. DeRubeis
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
Citations in the corpus
- Smoothing the trail for dissemination of evidence-based practices for youth: Flexibility within fidelity. (2007, background): “Treatment Fidelity and Manual-Based Treatments Fidelity has to do with the degree to which the treatment as written (described and prescribed in the written treatment manual) was indeed the treatment that was actually provided to (received by) the patient (see also Perepletchikova & Kazdin, 2005).”
- Training Therapists in Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Review of Studies From a Systems-Contextual Perspective (2010, background): “This finding is alarming when considering that skill and adherence (Perpepletchikova & Kazdin, 2005) are crucial to the transportation of a treatment from research to practice.”
- Implementation Fidelity in Community-Based Interventions (2010, background): “Competence relates to the skillfulness in the delivery of the intervention and includes interpersonal and process level skills (Forgatch et al., 2005; Perepletchikova & Kazdin, 2005; Stein et al., 2007).”
- Toward Developing a Science of Treatment Integrity: Introduction to the Special Series (2009, neutral): “…between an independent and a dependent variable (Baron & Kenny, 1986 Dusenbury et al., 2003; Fixsen et al., 2005), (b) proposing variables that intuitively seem to be associated with treatment integrity (e.g., Gresham, 1989), or (c) combining these approaches (e.g., Perepletchikova & Kazdin, 2005).”
- Mediators and mechanisms of change in psychotherapy research. (2007, background): “Investigators evaluate whether clients who received the treatment as intended show greater change than those who did not (for a review see Perepletchikova & Kazdin 2005).”
- Teacher Adherence and Its Relation to Teacher Attitudes and Student Outcomes in an Elementary School-Based Violence Prevention Program (2008, background): “Another factor is the degree to which the intervention is considered acceptable (Perepletchikova & Kazdin, 2005), which may depend on how well the program fits with teachers’ existing classroom management attitudes and practices (Detrich, 1999).”
- Therapist Adherence/Competence and Treatment Outcome: A Meta-Analytic Review (2010, background): “…adhering to the treatment under investigation, examining whether they are delivering its techniques or methods in a competent manner, and, if multiple treatment modalities are being evaluated, ensuring that these treatments can be differentiated from one another (Perepletchikova & Kazdin, 2005).”
- Advances in Treatment Integrity Research: Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Conceptualization, Measurement, and Enhancement of Treatment Integrity (2009, neutral): “However, validity data are rarely pro vided and, in the absence of these data, we cannot be sure that the measures actually as sess integrity (Perepletchikova & Kazdin, 2005).”
- Treatment Fidelity: What it is and Why it Matters (2021, background): “Available guidelines suggest that 80–100% adherence is considered high, 50–79% is considered moderate, and 0–49% is considered low treatment fidelity (Perepletchikova & Kazdin, 2005).”