Comparing the resource‐based and market‐based views of the firm: empirical evidence from Czech privatization

By Mona V. Makhija. 2003

335 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/26e1bb132120f0219e210be601fc3ea3e2860d0f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Economics and Econometrics

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

The contribution of tangible and intangible resources, and capabilities to a firm’s profitability and market performance (2013, background): “Fahy, 2002; Galbreath and Galvin, 2008; Schriber, 2015) have examined the relative effects of TR and IR on firm success in the same study and the justification of these studies is compelling particularly for validation of the main prescription of the RBV (Makhija, 2003; Galbreath and Galvin, 2008; S”
The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor (2006, background): “These intangible resources are frequently found in the organisation in the form of tacit knowledge (Makhija, 2003).”
The Influence of Industry Characteristics and Dynamic Capabilities on Firms’ Profitability (2017, result): “…besides the above mentioned study of Nedzinskas et al. (2013), it can be seen that they correspond to the results of the research of Malik and Kotabe (2009), in which organisational learning, reverse engineering and manufacturing flexibility are taken as dynamic capabilities, and Zhou et al.…”
The effect of domestic uncertainty on the real options value of international investments (2009, background): “While this research helped us to gain insights into the effect of uncertainty relating to the firm’s home environment on real option value, future studies can take into account the uncertainty of the firm’s external markets or locations of production.”
The impact of current and founding institutions on strength of competitive aspirations in transition economies (2012, methodology): “In current institutional environments with a high degree of market orientation, a firm’s efforts toward achieving a competitive goal will be connected with the outcome of those efforts (Makhija, 2003; Svejnar, 2002).”
The Relevance of the Institutional Underpinnings of Porter's Five Forces Framework to Emerging Economies: An Epistemological Analysis (2005, background): “More recently, Makhija (2003) provided strong evidence to our suggestion in the case of recently privatized firms in Czech Republic.”
Institutions, size and age in transition economies: Implications for export growth (2010, background): “Institutional support may manifest itself in the form of ease of obtaining permits, tax advantages, subsidies, regulation relief, and indirect preferential treatment (Hoskisson et al., 2000; Makhija, 2003).”
State Control and Corporate Governance in Transition Economies: 25 Years on from 1989 (2016, neutral): “According to the resource-based view (Makhija, 2003; Lazzarini, 2015), an important issue is not just the monitoring role of boards but also the value adding role of directors due to their human and social capital.”
Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditures in a sub‐Saharan economy: The institutional difference hypothesis (2013, methodology): “…Meyer and Rowan, 1977) and build on a well-established stream of emerging economies research the idea that institutional differences between developed and emerging economies have important effects on strategic decision making (Hoskisson et al., 2000; Makhija, 2003; Peng, 2003; Wright et al., 2005).”
The Roles and Performance of State Firms and Non-State Firms in China’s Economic Transition (2008, neutral): “They have widely applied the resource-based view (RBV) (Barney, 1991; Wernerfelt, 1984) and the resource dependence approach (Pfeffer & Salancik, 1978) to examine firm strategy and performance in transition economies (e.g., Davies & Walters, 2004; Flilatotchev, Wright, Uhlenbruck, Tihanyi, & Hoskiss”
Capital market response to emission rights returns: Evidence from the European power sector☆ (2009, background): “Following industrial economics, a high bargaining power and a high concentration (Porter,1991;Makhija, 2003) can result in benefits from rising factor costs.”
Flexibility in internationalization: is it valuable during an economic crisis? (2009, background): “…crisis may reflect confidence and certification on the part of banks and other lenders (Cole and Park, 1983; Saraswathy and Chatterjee, 1984; Makhija, 2003).5 Lower age of a firm may reflect an inability to develop a network of international investments, but may also reflect the agility of…”
Strategic resources and firm performance (2011, background): “Several studies (Makhija, 2003; Mehra, 1996; Spanos and Lioukas, 2001) have been carried out to explore whether resource-based factors or market-based factors best explain firm performance.”