Gender Differences in Learning Constructs, Shifts in Learning Constructs, and Their Relationship to Course Achievement in a Structured Inquiry, Yearlong College Physics Course for Life Science Majors
By A. Cavallo, Wendell H. Potter, M. Rozman. 2004
248 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/268760f9fc8587110595626a9d780ada595c033f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
- S. Glynn
- Gita Taasoobshirazi
- A. Winsler
- Peggy Brickman
- Gabrielle M. D’Lima
- Edgar Fuller
- Rachel Henderson
- Anastasia Kitsantas
In Education
- A. Winsler
- Gabrielle M. D’Lima
- Anastasia Kitsantas
- Gita Taasoobshirazi
- Peggy Brickman
- S. Glynn
- B. Zimmerman
- Alex J. Bowers
Citations in the corpus
- Elementary School Students’ Attitude toward Science and Related Variables (2016, unknown): “Rote learning and studying for higher grades do not support the science learning process in the long term due to the memorization of concepts (BouJaoude, 1992; Cavallo et al., 2003; Cavallo et al., 2004; Hacieminoglu et al., 2009; Novak, Ring & Tamir, 1971).”
- Nonscience majors learning science: A theoretical model of motivation (2007, background): “This is important because, in many studies of science majors (e.g., Cavallo et al., 2004), men have been found to have higher motivation than women.”
- Connecting High School Physics Experiences, Outcome Expectations, Physics Identity, and Physics Career Choice: A Gender Study. (2010, unknown): “…a link between physics conceptual understanding and performance (e.g., Eryilmaz, 2002; Hazari et al., 2007; Willson, Ackerman, & Malave, 2000), reasoning ability (e.g., Cavallo et al., 2004; Chin & Brown, 2000), self-ef fi cacy (e.g., Cavallo et al., 2004), and interest (e.g., Otero & Gray, 2008).”
- Why Are Some STEM Fields More Gender Balanced Than Others? (2017, unknown): “Among high school and undergraduate students, women report lower self-efficacy and self-views than men in computer science (Cheryan & Plaut, 2010; Irani, 2004; Rosson, Carroll, & Sinha, 2011) and physics (Cavallo, Potter, & Rozman, 2004; Sawtelle, Brewe, & Kramer, 2012).”
- Ethnic and Gender Differences in First-Year College Students’ Goal Orientation, Self-Efficacy, and Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation (2014, background): “However, female college students’ mastery goal orientation has been shown to decrease over an academic semester, whereas male college students’ mastery goal orientation increases (Cavallo et al., 2004).”
- Using the Social Cognitive Theory Framework to Chart Gender Differences in the Developmental Trajectory of STEM Self-Efficacy in Science and Engineering Students (2020, background): “Cavallo et al. (2004) found that men had significantly higher self-efficacy than women in an algebra-based physics course for life science majors.”