Determining the Extent to Which Program Structure Features and Integration Mechanisms Facilitate or Impede Doctoral Student Persistence in Mathematics

48 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

My World Is Not My Doctoral Program…Or Is It?: Female Students' Perceptions of Well-Being (2012, background): “A positive advisor relationship in which the student feels comfortable and able to approach her advisor is a key component to doctoral persistence (Earl-Novell, 2006).”
Hearing their voices: Factors doctoral candidates attribute to their persistence (2012, methodology): “For example, in some programs independent thought and creativity are valued, while in others, diligence and hard work may be admired (Earl-Novell, 2006).”
Potential Predictors of Timely Completion among Dissertation Research Students at an Australian Faculty of Sciences (2010, background): “Such data could be readily collected through questionnaires or interviews of individual students as described by other researchers (Ali & Kohun, 2007; Earl-Novell, 2006) or via further interrogation of institutional databases.”
Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy (2020, background): “Proper academic guidance, as reported in the literature, is a contributing factor in learners’ performances, achievement and satisfaction (Earl-Novell 2006).”