Self-Construals Across Cultures

By Charles Harb, Peter B. Smith. 2008

110 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Communication, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/2519c93f037dc7ddc18d97fcbf8b882af6f39db4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Communication

1. Berna Gerçek-Swing
2. Susan E. Cross
3. Piyush Sharma
4. E. Hardin
5. R. Cheng
6. Shui‐fong Lam

In Social Psychology

1. V. Slaughter
2. A. Shahaeian
3. Mark Nielsen
4. E. Hardin
5. C. Peterson
6. Berna Gerçek-Swing
7. Susan E. Cross
8. Piyush Sharma

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Berna Gerçek-Swing
2. Mark Nielsen
3. C. Peterson
4. Susan E. Cross
5. Piyush Sharma
6. E. Hardin
7. A. Shahaeian
8. V. Slaughter

Citations in the corpus

• The What, How, Why, and Where of Self-Construal (2011, methodology): “More recently, Harb and Smith (2008) created the Six-Fold Self-Construal Scale that integrates Brewer’s work on the personal, relational, and group selves (Brewer & Chen, 2007; Brewer & Gardner, 1996) with Singelis’s work on vertical and horizontal IND-COL (Singelis, Triandis, Bhawuk, & Gelfand,…”
• Does synchrony promote generalized prosociality? (2014, unknown): “…help, participants completed a questionnaire that measured the potential mediating variables of self-construal (the six-fold selfconstrual scale from Harb & Smith, 2008), levels of social inclusion (two adapted versions of the Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale [IOS], which measured closeness to…”
• Cultural and Family Influences on Children’s Theory of Mind Development (2014, background): “Thus to maintain relationships, one needs to be highly sensitive to others’ communicative intentions, as well as their language (Harb & Smith, 2008).”
• Measuring personal cultural orientations: scale development and validation (2010, background): “, Maheswaran and Shavitt 2000), we still lack robust crosscultural conceptual frameworks and reliable, valid scales with cross-cultural measurement equivalence (Bearden et al. 2006a; Harb and Smith 2008; Shavitt et al. 2006; Soares et al. 2007).”