Where Do Small Worlds Come From

By Joel A. C. Baum, Andrew V. Shipilov, Tim J. Rowley. 2003

450 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Finance, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22a450d8cf80de13531ff0af15ffc6c4b0cd5a77

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

In Finance

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Knowledge Portfolios and The Organization of Innovation Networks (2009, unknown): “w b0 8 w5w 2 +b 0 ; ( 5 ) where = max(0; (3 w)=2) and 0 = max(0; 2 w).”
Organizations Gone Wild: The Causes, Processes, and Consequences of Organizational Misconduct (2010, background): “High‐status organizations can easily initiate new exchange relations (Baum, Shipilov, & Rowley, 2003 ; Stuart, 1998 ), suggesting that departures will be disproportionately from the high‐status range of customers, thus reducing the relational status of the organization.”
The paradox of new venture legitimation within an entrepreneurial ecosystem (2017, background): “Baum et al. (2003) found small world network structures existing in the Canadian investment bank industry.”
Interorganizational Networks at the Network Level: A Review of the Empirical Literature on Whole Networks (2007, background): “As Baum et al. (2003) found in their study of subnetworks in Canadian banking, past relationships work to shape future relationships between organizations and the way the network operates as a whole. These relationships are not, however, necessarily stable over time. For instance, Powell et al. (200”
Network Strategies and Performance of Canadian Investment Banks (2006, unknown): “Each variable was included for at least one of the following three reasons: (1) earlier research on these data had shown the variable to have an effect on other dependent variables ( Baum, Shipilov, & Rowley, 2003; Rowley, Baum, Shipilov, Rao, & Greve, 2004); (2) the variable was well established i”
Can you have your Cake and Eat it too? Structural Holes' Influence on Status Accumulation and Market Performance in Collaborative Networks (2008, background): “…an advantageous position in the industry hierarchy by building relationships within their cohesive groups of underwriters (Rowley et al., 2005), between groups (Baum, Shipilov, and Rowley, 2003), and among allies that did not share any prior collaborative experiences with them (Baum et al., 2005).”
The interplay of need and opportunity in venture capital investment syndication (2010, background): “Specifically, in the VC industry, the syndicate ties represent only the visible manifestation of relationships: VCFs participating in syndicates together in any given year are also likely to interact with each other in other ways in subsequent years (Baum et al., 2003).”
Built to Last but Falling Apart: Cohesion, Friction, and Withdrawal from Interfirm Alliances (2010, unknown): “Powell, Koput, & Smith-Doerr, 1996) and change (Baum, Rowley, Shipilov & Chuang, 2005; Baum, Shipilov & Rowley, 2003 ).”
The governance of supply networks: a systematic literature review (2012, background): “Peripheral members of the network have the capacity to destabilize such networks and may cause them to fail (Baum et al., 2003).”
Exploring the Locus of Invention: The Dynamics of Network Communities and Firms' Invention Productivity (2014, background): “For example, many interorganizational networks have been identified as small-world systems featuring multiple dense, non-overlapping groups of firms that are only sparsely interlinked to other groups (e.g., Baum et al., 2003; Davis et al., 2003).”
Patterned Interactions in Complex Systems: Implications for Exploration (2007, background): “It is widely acknowledged that effective organizations strike a healthy balance between exploration and exploitation, even though it is organizationally difficult to accomplish both (Ghemawat and Ricart i Costa 1993; Tushman and O’Reilly 1996; Benner and Tushman 2003).”
Innovator networks and regional knowledge base (2008, methodology): “The crossover in the Watts-Strogatz model between a ”large world” (such as a lattice) and a small-world has been described in several studies (e.g. Baum et al. 2003, Cowan & Jonard 2004, Fleming et al. 2005).”
Microfoundations of Management: Behavioral Strategies and Levels of Rationality in Organizational Action (2013, background): “In fact, upward striving of low-access organizations has been documented empirically (Baum, Shipilov, & Rowley, 2003; Ozcan & Eisenhardt, 2009), while high-access organizations seem tolerant of ties with those in less favorable positions (Baum et al., 2003; Shipilov, Li, & Greve, 2011).”
Structural homophily or social asymmetry? The formation of alliances by poorly embedded firms (2009, background): “…influences alliance formation, the network perspective on interfirm collaboration highlights the influence of structural embeddedness (Gulati, Keywords: interorganizational networks; interfirm collaboration; joint ventures; embeddedness ∗ Correspondence to: Gautam Ahuja, University of…”