Impact of Ownership Type on Environment–Strategy Linkage and Performance: Evidence from a Transitional Economy
By Justin Tan. 2002
163 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Accounting
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/22989a43f97eebc5b8fde383f17cfbc5b531b009
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Accounting
- Tony W. Tong
- Mike W. Peng
- Alfredo De Massis
- Justin Tan
- Fang Lee Cooke
- Gabriel R. G. Benito
- Debi S. Saini
- J. Kotlar
Citations in the corpus
- Conflicting Selves: Family Owners' Multiple Goals and Self-Control Agency Problems in Private Firms (2018, background): “Moreover, our focus on private firms in a developed country responds to prior calls to conduct careful inquiries comparing and contrasting agency costs encountered in different types of firms and across different contexts (Bruton et al., 2010; Dharwadkar, George, & Brandes, 2000; Garg, 2013; Kim et ”
- (How) Does the HR strategy support an innovation oriented business strategy? An investigation of institutional context and organizational practices in Indian firms (2010, background): “Tan (2002) argued Human Resource Management DOI: 10.1002/hrm that ownership type has a significant impact on the environment-strategy configured, which in turn has important performance implications for the firm.”
- Corporate Philanthropic Disaster Response and Ownership Type: Evidence from Chinese Firms’ Response to the Sichuan Earthquake (2009, background): “With regard to firm ownership types, the comparison of characteristics, strategies, and performance between state- and non-state-ownership firms has been documented extensively (Tan, 2002).”
- Do State Enterprises Manage Earnings More than Privately Owned Firms? The Case of China (2011, unknown): “Since the impact of ownership has to be analyzed in a context whereby firms of different ownership types coexist and compete (Tan, 2002), the gradual privatization process of Chinese SOEs offers an ideal environment to examine the impact of ownership structure.”
- The Performance Differential between Private and State Owned Enterprises: The Roles of Ownership, Management and Market Structure (2008, background): “This learning potential should be particularly relevant for firms that have not attained the best practice and that operate under softer budget constraints (Tan, 2002; Tan and Peng, 2003), allowing them to learn over time without having to exit the market.”
- Ownership Types and Strategic Groups in an Emerging Economy (2004, methodology): “However, the economic landscape in emerging economies features substantially more organizational diversity compared to the dichotomy of public versus private ownership (Peng, 2000, 2003; Tan, 2002).”
- State governance and technological innovation in emerging economies: State-owned enterprise restructuration and institutional logic dissonance in China’s high-speed train sector (2020, background): “State ownership and affiliation not only provide resources but also exert institutional pressure on the firm (Mahmood & Rufin, 2005; Tan, 2002; Meyer & Peng, 2016; Ramamurti & Hillemann, 2018; Buckley, Clegg, Voss, Cross, Liu, & Zheng, 2018).”
- Organizational Slack and Firm Performance During Economic Transitions: Two Studies from an Emerging Economy (2003, background): “Moreover, a great number of multinationals have entered these emerging economies, asserting pressures on SOEs to either sink or swim in the emerging ocean of competition (Beamish, 1993; Luo and Peng, 1999; Tan, 2002; Yan and Gray, 1994).”