The alignment of appropriate firm and supply strategies for competitive advantage

By Paul Cousins. 2005

250 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management Information Systems, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21ef7acc5b563bc5d1617dcc682496b2bc8f91e5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management Information Systems

1. A. Millington
2. Mark A. Johnson
3. Stefan Hoejmose
4. Tage Skjøtt-Larsen
5. J. G. Benito
6. Juliana H. Mikkola
7. Herbert Kotzab
8. Stephen Brammer

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Stephen Brammer
2. A. Millington
3. Stefan Hoejmose
4. J. G. Benito
5. Raduan Che Rose
6. H. Lightfoot
7. Manish Gupta

In Strategy and Management

1. Stephen Brammer
2. A. Millington
3. Mark A. Johnson
4. Stefan Hoejmose
5. Tage Skjøtt-Larsen
6. Jegak Uli
7. J. G. Benito
8. Raduan Che Rose

Citations in the corpus

• On the effects of supply strategy on business performance: do the relationships among generic competitive objectives matter? (2010, background): “Many studies analyze the determinants and consequences of collaborative strategies (e.g., Heide and John, 1990; Cousins, 2005; Ahola et al., 2008), using now-popular terms such as partnership sourcing (McIvor and McHugh, 2000), strategic sourcing (Talluri and Narasimhan, 2004), co-makership (Bevan,…”
• Management, strategic management theories and thelinkage with organizational competitive advantage from theresource-based View (2009, background): “…of competitive advantage is indeed an idea that is at the heart of much of the strategic management literature (Burden and Proctor, 2000; Fahy, 2000; Ma, 2000, 2004; Barney, 2001a, 2001b, 2007; Lin, 2003; Fahy, Farrelly and Quester, 2004; Cousins, 2005; Porter and Kramer, 2006; Liao and Hu, 2007).”
• An empirical examination of the relationship between business strategy and socially responsible supply chain management (2013, methodology): “This is the first systematic study of the relationship between business strategy and SR-SCM.”
• Purchasing strategy development: A multi-level review (2015, unknown): “Cousins et al. (2008) CO ● ● ● ●”
• Buyer‐supplier relationships in a servitized environment: An examination with Cannon and Perreault's framework (2012, background): “Whilst there has been relatively comprehensive use of TCE (Cousins, 2005; Ellram et al., 2008), RDT (Kaufmann and Carter, 2006; Holweg and Pil, 2008), SET (Griffith et al.”
• The path of innovation: purchasing and supplier involvement into new product development (2015, unknown): “Following other similar key informant-based research studies (Cini et al., 1993; Cousins, 2005), the goal was to find the right person within the organisation who was able to respond to all of the questions about the purchasing strategy, the buyer-supplier relation, purchasing practices and…”
• Complementary theories to supply chain management (2007, background): “Only few contributions demonstrate how to deal with the phenomena of SCM from a middle-range theoretical perspective (New, 1997; Mears-Young and Jackson, 1997; Olavarrieta and Ellinger, 1997; Handfield and Melnyk, 1998; Logan, 2000; Arlbjoern and Halldorsson, 2002; Ketchen and Guinepero, 2004; Cousi”