Guidelines for Reporting Quantitative Methods and Results in Primary Research

By J. Norris, Luke Plonsky, S. Ross, R. Schoonen. 2015

108 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/21cf9783c0b1d35f3951f4f82ce28935668dcc4c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Luke Plonsky
2. F. Oswald
3. E. Marsden
4. Ali H. Al-Hoorie
5. Joseph P. Vitta
6. S. Gass
7. Dustin Crowther
8. Patti Spinner

In Language and Linguistics

1. Luke Plonsky
2. F. Oswald
3. Joseph P. Vitta
4. Ali H. Al-Hoorie
5. E. Marsden
6. S. Gass
7. Dustin Crowther
8. Patti Spinner

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Joseph P. Vitta
2. Ali H. Al-Hoorie
3. F. Oswald
4. Luke Plonsky

Citations in the corpus

• MULTIPLE REGRESSION AS A FLEXIBLE ALTERNATIVE TO ANOVA IN L2 RESEARCH (2016, methodology): “A recent methodological synthesis published in Language Learning and Studies in Second Language Acquisition, for instance, reported that 56% of the 606 quantitative studies in the sample included one or more ANOVAs (Plonsky, 2013) (followed by the t-test, which is the two-group analog of ANOVA [43%]”
• The seven sins of L2 research: A review of 30 journals’ statistical quality and their CiteScore, SJR, SNIP, JCR Impact Factors (2019, methodology): “Norris et al. (2015) echoed the call for researchers to address reliability while also arguing that researchers provide ‘validity evidence’ (p. 472).”
• A methodological synthesis and meta-analysis of judgment tasks in second language research (2020, background): “As the result of greater attention as well as, perhaps, improved training and stricter journal standards (e.g. Norris et al., 2015), methodological rigor in the field appears to be improving.”