Intuitive rules in science and mathematics: a reaction time study

By Reuven Babai, T. Levyadun, Ruth Stavy, D. Tirosh. 2006

53 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, Education, Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/210e096ff35c3772cea63684720c543f5c425256

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Ruth Stavy
2. Lieven Verschaffel
3. W. Van Dooren
4. Reuven Babai
5. Walter Schaeken
6. E. Gillard

In Education

1. W. Van Dooren
2. Lieven Verschaffel
3. Joris J. van Hoof
4. Reuven Babai
5. Walter Schaeken
6. E. Gillard
7. Ruth Stavy
8. Dirk De Bock

In Statistics and Probability

1. W. Van Dooren
2. Lieven Verschaffel
3. Joris J. van Hoof
4. Reuven Babai
5. Walter Schaeken
6. E. Gillard
7. Ruth Stavy
8. Dirk De Bock

Citations in the corpus

• Overcoming intuitive interference in mathematics: insights from behavioral, brain imaging and intervention studies (2010, methodology): “Similar results were obtained with high school students majoring in mathematics ( Babai et al. 2006b ).”
• Are secondary school students still hampered by the natural number bias? A reaction time study on fraction comparison tasks (2013, background): “For example, Babai et al. (2006) found Research in Mathematics Education 155”
• Dual Processes in the Psychology of Mathematics Education and Cognitive Psychology (2009, methodology): “This has been found for a comparison-of-perimeter task [Babai et al., 2006b; Stavy et al., 2006b] and for a probability task [Babai et al., 2006a].”