Factors affecting university-industry R&D projects: The importance of searching, screening and signalling

By Roberto Fontana, Aldo Geuna, Mireille Matt. 2006

696 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1f50db31765c62ba7ef3949c10a90901b4bea22f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model (2010, background): “By collecting information on technologies, arkets and competitors (Bougrain and Haudeville, 2002), and on otential partners (Fontana et al., 2006), an intermediary can crete and maintain a relevant database, and share the information to upport SMEs’ search processes.”
Open innovation for SMEs in developing countries – An intermediated communication network model for collaboration beyond obstacles (2012, background): “2003), or it can provide SMEs vital information needed for collaboration (McEvily & Zaheer 1999; Moodley & Morris 2004; Fontana et al. 2006; Sousa & Bradley 2009).”
Impact of university intellectual property policy on the performance of university-industry research collaboration (2012, background): “A firm with higher R&D capability is more likely to be involved in UIC (Cohen and Levinthal 1989; Fontana et al. 2006; Lopez 2008).”
Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions (2010, background): “Finally, surveys by Laursen and Salter (2004) and Fontana et al. (2006) suggest the openness of firms to the external environment to significantly affect the probability of interacting with universities.”
Beneath the tip of the iceberg: exploring the multiple forms of university–industry linkages (2011, neutral): “Consequently, a firm’s size and the industrial sector in which it is situated are major factors explaining the type and level of interaction (Mohnen and Hoareau 2003; Laursen and Salter 2004; Fontana et al. 2006).”
Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: Empirical evidence from Germany (2010, background): “Pevious research shows that particularly firms with a high R&D intensity tend to engage in cooperations with academic institutions (Arundel and Geuna, 2004; Fontana et al., 2006).”
Differences in technology transfer between science-based and development based industries: transfer mechanisms and barriers (2011, background): “While recent empirical studies have only considered technology transfer from either the perspective of industry (Cohen et al., 2002; Fontana et al., 2006) or from the perspective of academia (DiGregorio and Shane, 2003; Calderini et al.”
Working with distant researchers—Distance and content in university–industry interaction (2010, neutral): “In the path-breaking contributions of Klevorick et al. (1995), Cohen et al. (2002) and Fontana et al. (2006), academic research is found to contribute to two types of basic objectives – generation of new ideas or for innovation completion – to similar extent.”
University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda (2007, positive): “For Europe, 24 evidence suggests that firms that screen scientific publications and are involved in public policies have more collaborative relationships with universities (Fontana et al. 2006) but this does not indicate whether the relationships are effective.”