Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model

By Sungjoon Lee, Gwangman Park, Byungun Yoon, Jinwoo Park. 2010

1,480 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management of Technology and Innovation, Strategy and Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/a3dc3411f622dd672669b4dc5cf544aefcd0cb33

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management of Technology and Innovation

In Strategy and Management

Citations in the corpus

Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation (2018, positive): “Thus, the extent to which innovation intermediaries collaborate with different actors in an ecosystem may determine their ability to generate value through collaboration (Lee et al., 2010).”
How Can External Relationships Enhance Innovation in SMEs? New Evidence for Europe* (2012, background): “Some recent studies (Hadjimanolis 2000; Lee et al. 2010; Romijn and Albaladejo 2002; van de Vrande et al. 2009) have begun to analyze open innovation in smaller organizations, to test whether the innovation performance of SMEs can be enhanced by the strategic use of external relationships.”
The Role of Networks in Small and Medium‐Sized Enterprise Innovation and Firm Performance (2012, methodology): “Path A: Networks and Innovation Breadth The importance of networks and social capital to innovation in SMEs is well documented (Ahuja 2000; Lee et al. 2010; Rogers 2004; Zeng, Xie, and Tam 2010).”
The Open Innovation Paradox: Knowledge Sharing and Protection in R&D Collaborations (2010, neutral): “For example, while the cases in this study include companies of various sizes, the attributes of and impact of open innovation for SMEs is not yet fully understood (see Lee et al. , 2010”
Innovation in Family Firms: A Systematic Literature Review and Guidance for Future Research (2018, background): “Innovation literature has substantially dealt with small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME) innovation (e.g. Lee et al. 2010; Thorpe et al. 2005), exploring innovation challenges and opportunities relative to firm size.”
Open innovation and company culture: Internal openness makes the difference (2017, background): “…community sense, it can be argued that suppliers are becoming ever more important not only as sources but also contributors to innovation and commercial success (Chiaroni et al., 2011; Dahlandera and Gann, 2010; Harison and Koski, 2009; Huizingh, 2011; Lee et al., 2010; Van den Biesen, 2008).”
Open innovation practices in SMEs and large enterprises (2012, neutral): “Although SMEs are generally considered to be extremely vital in innovation systems, only a few studies (Laursen and Salter 2006; Van de Vrande et al. 2009; Lee et al. 2010) have addressed OI practices in small firms.”
Inbound Open Innovation Activities in High‐Tech SMEs: The Impact on Innovation Performance (2012, background): “SMEs could benefit from exploring innovative development and commercialization opportunities with other small established firms as they can jointly enter new markets and substantially improve their chances against larger competitors (Christensen, Olesen, and Kjær 2005; Lee et al. 2010).”
The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration (2014, methodology): “Following Laursen and Salter (2004, 2006), this measure has been used in numerous studies of open innovation to proxy for firm-level openness (see for example, Tether and Tajar, 2008; Grimpe and Sofka, 2009; Lee et al., 2010; Leiponen and Helfat, 2010; Garriga et al., 2013; Love et al., 2013).”
Open innovation: State of the art and future perspectives (2011, background): “Lee et al. (2010) observe that open innovation practices at smaller companies are more common in the latter innovation phases, especially the commercialization phase.”