Organizational knowledge creation and the generation of new product ideas: A behavioral approach
By Anja Schulze, Martin Hoegl. 2008
236 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Science Applications, Management Science and Operations Research, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1eead51e3e6fcb4223d3c736d478be5228694525
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Science Applications
- Barry L. Bayus
- Marion K. Poetz
- Martin Schreier
- Ethan Mollick
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Alexander S. Kier
- Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara
- Enrique Estellés Arolas
In Management Science and Operations Research
- Barry L. Bayus
- Bjoern Sebastian Reiche
- Jiyao Chen
- Martin Schreier
- Ethan Mollick
- Jeffery S. McMullen
- Alexander S. Kier
- Fernando González-Ladrón-de-Guevara
In Strategy and Management
- R. Mitch Casselman
- Marion K. Poetz
- Bjoern Sebastian Reiche
- Barry L. Bayus
- Petra A. Nylund
- Jiyao Chen
- Eric Quintane
- Martin Schreier
Citations in the corpus
- Innovation as a Knowledge-Based Outcome (2011, background): “…studies have explored the empirical validity of this model (Martin-de-Castro et al., 2008) and the conceptual relationship between knowledge creation and innovation (Popidiuk and Choo, 2006), studies linking knowledge creation to innovation are just beginning to emerge (Schulze and Hoegl, 2008).”
- The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? (2012, background): “Based on extensive marketing research (or not) and using some theoretical approach to creativity in new product development (NPD) (e.g., Amabile, Barsade, Mueller, and Staw, 2005; Goldenberg, Lehmann, and Mazursky, 2001; Majchrzak, Cooper, and Neece, 2004; Schulze and Hoegl, 2008), those professiona”
- Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community (2013, background): “Given the need for a continual stream of new products and services, firms have traditionally relied on an internal staff of professional inventors to generate ideas (Ernst et al. 2000, Schulze and Hoegl 2008).”
- Innovation Performance in New Product Development Teams in China's Technology Ventures: The Role of Behavioral Integration Dimensions and Collective Efficacy (2015, background): “Collaborative behavior stimulates not only the “requisite variety” of sparks from team leaders and members, but also the coalescence of those sparks into creative ideas (Schulze and Hoegl, 2008), thereby generating the synergistic benefits of having multiple perspectives in NPD teams (Boone and Hend”