The Evaluation of the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality Questionnaire (SEEQ) in UK Higher Education

By M. Coffey, Graham R. Gibbs. 2001

173 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1d84f6d7765607b472cd0fc271605b83dbf34d7d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Bert Brockx
2. Inge Hill
3. D. Parsons
4. Michael Prosser
5. John T. E. Richardson
6. Jane Holland
7. D. Willis
8. Mark Rickinson

In Education

1. Michael Prosser
2. Inge Hill
3. D. Parsons
4. Jane Holland
5. D. Willis
6. Mark Rickinson
7. A. Hanbury
8. Bert Brockx

Citations in the corpus

• Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature (2005, background): “Coffey and Gibbs (2001) arranged for a shortened version of the SEEQ containing 24 items from six scales) to be administered to students at nine universities in the UK.”
• On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “…Expected/fairness of grading Instructor liking/concern Perceived learning Marsh et al. (2009) SEEQ 9 Learning/value Marsh (1982) Instructor enthousiasm Coffey & Gibbs (2001) Organization/clarity Group interaction Individual rapport Breadth Exam/graded materials Readings/assignments Workload…”
• The differential impact of UK accredited teaching development programmes on academics’ approaches to teaching (2008, methodology): “The first compared the students’ ratings of their lecturers’ teaching skills using six scales from the Student Evaluation of Educational Quality questionnaire validated for use in the UK (Coffey and Gibbs 2000 ), and the ‘good teaching’ scale from the Module Experience Questionnaire, based on the C”
• Impact of Teaching Development Programmes in Higher Education. HEA Research Series. (2012, methodology): “There would seem to be much greater potential for either harnessing existing tools and frameworks (e.g. ATI, MEQ for benchmarking teacher attitudes and practices, and SPQ, ASI, SEEQ or others for assessing student outcomes) and also for mapping post-programme changes.”
• Student Perspectives on Teaching and its Evaluation (2002, unknown): “…and syntheses of the literature include those by Abrami et al. (1990); Aleamoni (1981); Cashin (1988, 1995); Centra (1973, 1977, 1993); Coffey & Gibbs (2001); Cohen (1980); Costin et al. (1971); Doyle (1983); Feldman (1976, 1989, 1993); Marsh (1987); Overall and Marsh (1980); Patrick…”