The differential impact of UK accredited teaching development programmes on academics’ approaches to teaching

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Teaching university teachers to become better teachers: the effects of pedagogical training courses at six Swedish universities (2018, methodology): “Our study bears more semblance to the large scale studies by Gibbs and Coffey (2004), Postareff, Lindblom-Ylänne, and Nevgi (2007; 2008), and Hanbury et al. (2008) which show that pedagogical training can improve the participants’ attitudes to teaching, that students appreciate instruction by…”
Major influences on the teaching and assessment of graduate attributes (2012, result): “This aligns with the growing number of studies that show the positive impacts tertiary teaching qualifications have on teaching practices, student learning and academic staff confidence and willingness (see, for example, Hanbury, Prosser, & Rickinson, 2008 ; Postareff, Lindblom-Ylanne, & Ngevi, 20”
Impact of Teaching Development Programmes in Higher Education. HEA Research Series. (2012, background): “There has been, until recently, much less systematic research interest on programme outcomes, and the difference they make to participants and practice (Hanbury et al., 2008).”
The impact of a Postgraduate Certificate in Teaching in Higher Education on university lecturers appointed for their professional expertise at a teaching-led university: ‘It’s made me braver’ (2012, unknown): “Interestingly, it has been reported that newer institutions and health care sciences rated the programmes most positively (Hanbury et al., 2008).”