Student Perspectives on Teaching and its Evaluation

By Karin J. Spencer, L. Schmelkin. 2002

180 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, Management of Technology and Innovation, Media Technology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5652a54179feae4da6ca15b930d296c3173dddca

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
2. Kathleen M. T. Collins
3. Bert Brockx
4. D. Mortelmans
5. P. Spooren
6. Ann E. Witcher
7. Janet D. Filer
8. Christopher Moore

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Bert Brockx
2. John T. E. Richardson
3. Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
4. Kathleen M. T. Collins
5. D. Mortelmans
6. P. Spooren
7. Marcus Johnson
8. Gale M. Sinatra

In Media Technology

1. John T. E. Richardson
2. Anthony J. Onwuegbuzie
3. Kathleen M. T. Collins

Citations in the corpus

• On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching (2013, background): “Spencer and Schmelkin (2002) reported from a mail survey to a random sample of students that students are”
• Students’ Perceptions of Characteristics of Effective College Teachers: A Validity Study of a Teaching Evaluation Form Using a Mixed-Methods Analysis (2007, methodology): “Also, TEF data regularly are used to facilitate research on teaching and learning (Babad, 2001; Gray & Bergmann, 2003; Kulik, 2001; Marsh, 1987; Marsh & Roche, 1993; Seldin, 1993; Spencer & Schmelkin, 2002).”
• Instruments for obtaining student feedback: a review of the literature (2005, background): “Indeed, unless students can see that the expression of their opinions leads to concrete changes in teaching practices, they may make little use of their own ratings (Spencer & Schmelkin, 2002).”
• Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: development of an instrument based on 10 Likert‐scales (2007, background): “, 2002 ; Spencer & Schmelkin, 2002 ) one comes to the conclusion that many valid and reliable evaluation instruments that can be used by students have been developed.”