Back to the Future: Implications for the Field of HRM of the Multistakeholder Perspective Proposed 30 Years Ago

By Michael Beer, Paul Boselie, C. Brewster. 2015

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Accounting, Management of Technology and Innovation, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1c439937dc5f39f11ec8c9c10355972bfb378e8a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Accounting

1. Sharon K. Parker
2. Tanya V. Bondarouk
3. Asta Savaneviciene
4. C. Brewster
5. Ž. Stankevičiūtė

In Management of Technology and Innovation

1. Sharon K. Parker
2. Asta Savaneviciene
3. C. Brewster
4. Ž. Stankevičiūtė

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Caroline Knight
2. Sharon K. Parker
3. Tanya V. Bondarouk
4. Asta Savaneviciene
5. C. Brewster
6. Ž. Stankevičiūtė
7. Adam M. Grant
8. Stefan Strohmeier

Citations in the corpus

• Designing Sustainable HRM: The Core Characteristics of Emerging Field (2018, background): “First, despite the multidimensional nature of organizational outcomes [9], a huge number of studies have mainly defined the organizational performance outcomes in terms of economic measures, neglecting employee well-being [3,4].”
• How work redesign interventions affect performance: An evidence-based model from a systematic review (2021, background): “The early focus of this research was on short-term productivity and efficiency, with a later, longer-term strategic view acknowledging employees as both a major source of human capital and an organizational cost (Beer et al., 2015).”
• Conceptualising the future of HRM and technology research (2016, background): “Thus, the other stakeholders (Beer, Boselie, & Brewster, 2015) and employee well-being hardly featured (though see, for example, Collins & Porras, 1997; Pfeffer, 1994, 1998).”