Radical and Incremental Creativity: Antecedents and Processes
By Lucy L. Gilson, Nora Y. Madjar. 2011
211 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Mechanical Engineering, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/1b6ff7ac64517cb5374ab3feb8cf4984c70365b3
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- R. Kark
- O. Epitropaki
- C. Mainemelis
- Amy E. Randel
- Kimberly S. Jaussi
- Nicole M. Gillespie
- John Steen
- R. Shazi
In Mechanical Engineering
In Social Psychology
- R. Kark
- O. Epitropaki
- C. Mainemelis
- Amy E. Randel
- Kimberly S. Jaussi
- Nicole M. Gillespie
- John Steen
- R. Shazi
Citations in the corpus
- Trust as a predictor of innovation network ties in project teams (2015, background): “More generically, these context-specific findings suggest that the role and importance of trust for tie formation are influenced by firm characteristics, particularly the organisation's position on the incremental–radical innovation spectrum (Gilson and Madjar, 2011; Madjar et al., 2011) and size (p”
- Creative Leadership: A Multi-Context Conceptualization† (2015, background): “…and developed on the basis of concrete practices, and organizational identification; whereas radical creativity is related more to intrinsic motivation, willingness to take risks, career commitment, and ideas that are problem-driven and abstract (Gilson & Madjar, 2011; Madjar et al., 2011).”
- Where to Look? Creative Self-Efficacy, Knowledge Retrieval, and Incremental and Radical Creativity (2014, methodology): “Gilson and Madjar (2011) found that intrinsic motivation relates more strongly to radical creativity and extrinsic motivation is more strongly related to incremental creativity, but questions still remain about the process—including both motivational variables (such as creative self-efficacy) and…”